It's 2011 already, hey Glenn Beck what happened to your end of the world, economic disaster prediction?!?!?!! It's about time to retire you just lost your credibility!
i think nixon was taking part of an elarbate plan for control over the world when he took out the gold standard. I think all of these circumstances are planned out events in "the big picture".
When will the 65 Trillion dollar actual debt be paid for? Not by your or me..... probably by your 2 year old? Probably by my children and surely their children.... that is, if the currency and governemt still exists as we know it. So yes, they are taxing your 2 year old because this generation will not pay for it but your child and my child will have to pay for it..... get what I'm saying now? We are charging our children so we can have 15 billion dollar floss programs....we're stealin from them
1) I don't know what you mean by taxing future generations... My 2 year old hasn't paid any taxes and I still get a tax reduction for having had him.
2) You think that someone doing a bad thing by accident is immoral. I now understand where you are coming from, but I disagree. I don't personally think Obama/Reserve is TRYING to cause an inflation. If I'm wrong and someone IS for some weird reason, then that is immoral.
Not only this, but ad hominum tactics are meant to distract the audience from the real argument, however, the words that I used are only descriptors relating to our economic discourse. Ad Hominem? Maybe. Related? Absolutely. True? I don't see anything that would tell me different.
Anybody who taxes future generations is very much so committing an immoral act.... don't worry though, the blame can be spread around amongst all members of Congress as well, however, back to answering your point: Yes, if you purposefully or inadvertantly attempt to destroy a currency by debasement you are in effect hurting countless future generations. just like stealing is immoral, this what is going on right now is immoral because the current admin. and congress is taking from future gen's.
Looks like theories of how the thought process works has gone over your head. My point is that gravity, albeit completely proven and a constant is assumed when its effects are about to take hold of an object..... just like, speaking in pure economics, when the price of a widget increases the consumption goes down, just like when you look at the exponential rate we are belching carbon gasses into the air, you would assume that the ppm in the air will continue to increase.
Thus far you've called me uneducated, unintelligent, Marxian, and partisan. Enough ad hominem?
But you've barely touched on my point, which was explaining why the bailout plan or the Federal Reserve's depositing of money into the economy, etc is a MORAL issue.
I think that the bailouts in 2008 were a terrible idea and the current budget plan will probably cause more inflation, but it is hard to draw a line from a pres causing inflation to that pres being immoral.
Sorry, but I do not speculate when it comes to gravity! If you think that the law and theory of gravity still require speculation, you haven't read enough middle school science books.
Yes, Gore is speculating on the effects of global warming. As is Glen Beck when he surmises that Obama is going to create a massive devaluation and further economic plunge.
My original argument, though, was that this last ditch effort to fix the economy wasn't an immoral act.
You're no good at this one900meat. Al Gore is speculating on the future in his video and when you drop a penny from the top of a building you know, based on your previous knowledge, that it will hit the ground due to the force of gravity - again, speculation. I haven't been talking to miss Cleo but have you been talking to Mr. Marx?
It's 2011 already, hey Glenn Beck what happened to your end of the world, economic disaster prediction?!?!?!! It's about time to retire you just lost your credibility!
liberalandcountryfan 1 year ago
i think nixon was taking part of an elarbate plan for control over the world when he took out the gold standard. I think all of these circumstances are planned out events in "the big picture".
LostInThought11 3 years ago
When will the 65 Trillion dollar actual debt be paid for? Not by your or me..... probably by your 2 year old? Probably by my children and surely their children.... that is, if the currency and governemt still exists as we know it. So yes, they are taxing your 2 year old because this generation will not pay for it but your child and my child will have to pay for it..... get what I'm saying now? We are charging our children so we can have 15 billion dollar floss programs....we're stealin from them
wdlake 3 years ago
1) I don't know what you mean by taxing future generations... My 2 year old hasn't paid any taxes and I still get a tax reduction for having had him.
2) You think that someone doing a bad thing by accident is immoral. I now understand where you are coming from, but I disagree. I don't personally think Obama/Reserve is TRYING to cause an inflation. If I'm wrong and someone IS for some weird reason, then that is immoral.
one900meat 3 years ago
Not only this, but ad hominum tactics are meant to distract the audience from the real argument, however, the words that I used are only descriptors relating to our economic discourse. Ad Hominem? Maybe. Related? Absolutely. True? I don't see anything that would tell me different.
wdlake 3 years ago
Anybody who taxes future generations is very much so committing an immoral act.... don't worry though, the blame can be spread around amongst all members of Congress as well, however, back to answering your point: Yes, if you purposefully or inadvertantly attempt to destroy a currency by debasement you are in effect hurting countless future generations. just like stealing is immoral, this what is going on right now is immoral because the current admin. and congress is taking from future gen's.
wdlake 3 years ago
*Facepalm^2*
Looks like theories of how the thought process works has gone over your head. My point is that gravity, albeit completely proven and a constant is assumed when its effects are about to take hold of an object..... just like, speaking in pure economics, when the price of a widget increases the consumption goes down, just like when you look at the exponential rate we are belching carbon gasses into the air, you would assume that the ppm in the air will continue to increase.
wdlake 3 years ago
Thus far you've called me uneducated, unintelligent, Marxian, and partisan. Enough ad hominem?
But you've barely touched on my point, which was explaining why the bailout plan or the Federal Reserve's depositing of money into the economy, etc is a MORAL issue.
I think that the bailouts in 2008 were a terrible idea and the current budget plan will probably cause more inflation, but it is hard to draw a line from a pres causing inflation to that pres being immoral.
Attack my points; not me.
one900meat 3 years ago
*Facepalm*
Sorry, but I do not speculate when it comes to gravity! If you think that the law and theory of gravity still require speculation, you haven't read enough middle school science books.
Yes, Gore is speculating on the effects of global warming. As is Glen Beck when he surmises that Obama is going to create a massive devaluation and further economic plunge.
My original argument, though, was that this last ditch effort to fix the economy wasn't an immoral act.
one900meat 3 years ago
You're no good at this one900meat. Al Gore is speculating on the future in his video and when you drop a penny from the top of a building you know, based on your previous knowledge, that it will hit the ground due to the force of gravity - again, speculation. I haven't been talking to miss Cleo but have you been talking to Mr. Marx?
wdlake 3 years ago