Ed and Clarice (40) VOTE NO on AMENDMENT #2
Loading...
1,909
Top Comments
see all
All Comments (10)
-
frogjet the older population chose partnerships Financial reasons.
-
Unbelievable. The most simple solution, to demonstrate your faith, commitment and character and actually get married would resolve all of these problems. To claim that you are having a right taken away from you when the opportunity to obtain that right is staring you in the face is absurd and downright stupid. You can't fix dumb...
-
So straight people shacking up has what to do with Ammendment 2?
-
Amendment 2 only defines marriage and nothing more! Don't believe the special intrest groups who are trying to scare seniors!
VOTE YES ON 2!
-
VOTE NO ON TWO!!!!!!
Loading...
It also works by disenfranchising any relationship that is not a marriage including a boyfriend and girlfriend who live together - I already know a gay couple who claim to be cousins in order to see each other in the hospital to get around stupid rules. How is this kind of discrimination right ? Take your sanctity of marriage crap and try living by it, instead of restricting how others can choose to live their lives. Everyone should be treated equally under the law. This is not a minority view.
masterofmetacognitio 3 years ago 3
The ACLU will most certainly challenge the law because it excludes select citizens from "rights" given to all who are presumably equal under the law.Why would some, by accident of ethnicity, gender, religion or sexuality be more worthy of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness? Perhaps a better question is why would those who ARE by accident of their ethnicity, gender, religion or sexuality enjoying life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness deny these same rights to other citizens?
cynjdugg 3 years ago