YouTube home Comedy Week on YouTube
Upload

Kirk Sorensen - A Global Alternative (thorium energy via LFTR) @ TEAC4

gordonmcdowell gordonmcdowell·211 videos
1,781
11,021
Like     Dislike 1

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like gordonmcdowell's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike gordonmcdowell's video.

Sign in to YouTube

Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add gordonmcdowell's video to your playlist.

Published on Jul 8, 2012

http://thoriumremix.com/ Kirk Sorensen for harnessing the power of the atom using Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors (LFTR).

LFTR offers greater efficiency and safety over today's operating reactors, and even proposed light water / boiling water reactors. LFTR also provides spare processes heat and valuable isotopes as a byproduct of normal operation, something today's reactors can not, due to their low operating temperature.

Topics emphasized by Kirk at TEAC4:

- Economic and political situation of medical isotope production and applications.

- Use as a reliable energy production method of US military bases explained in their jargon.

- Desalination enabled by the high temperatures possible when using ionic salts instead of covalently bonded molecules to transfer heat.

Kirk Sorensen's talk was one of many at Thorium Energy Alliance Conference #4 in Chicago.

Kirk Sorensen is working on LFTR development at Flibe Energy: http://Flibe-Energy.com

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

The interactive transcript could not be loaded.

Loading icon Loading...

Loading icon Loading...

Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.

Uploader Comments (gordonmcdowell)

  • gordonmcdowell

    Joseph, this is the different perspective take on energy consumption. We use a great deal of stored energy (per capita and in total) compared to our ancestors. So if you want to mitigate our impact on the planet, we can consume less energy, consume it more efficiently, or consume CLEANER energy.

    By pursuing CLEANER advances can be applied to emerging countries too... YOU use less energy? Great. But you are just you. India & China's middle class won't care, it is their turn for quality of life.

    · 18

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gordonmcdowell's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gordonmcdowell's comment.
    in reply to Joseph Krane (Show the comment)
  • Justavian

    I've seen him discuss this topic dozens of times, and i'm enamored with the idea that we could start heading in that direction. However, i'd like to see some kind of debate between Kirk and some of his detractors. I've seen lots of people mentioning the stumbling blocks - incredibly corrosive liquids, insufficient materials research for the reactor - Kirk doesn't address these things in detail. I want to believe Thorium is the godsend he says, but i'm worried we're glossing over something...

    · 9

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Justavian's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Justavian's comment.
  • gordonmcdowell

    We have some video dialog pertaining to corrosion, so as I'm working thru materials in chronological order eventually that will get posted. But I don't have any debate between Kirk and a (say) Rod Adams type person who's more keen on LWR (in fact Rod is keen on LFTR but thinks LWR is being maligned unfairly). I hope that can happen some day.

    What's looking challenging is getting an anti-nuke to talk to Kirk. Anti-vs-Nuke debates do happen, but so far it has been out of my reach.

    · 8

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gordonmcdowell's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gordonmcdowell's comment.
    in reply to Justavian (Show the comment)
  • qwertzu3

    at 13:13 he says the current modell they are working contains Uranium 233 as a salt. I thought it would run on Thorium salts? I dont understand ...

    · 3

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate qwertzu3's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate qwertzu3's comment.
  • gordonmcdowell

    16:46 probably explains that best, in the slide you see Thorium-233 decays to Uranium-233 so the solution will contain both... Thorium-233 is added as fuel but it is Uranium-233 which fissions.

    · 5

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gordonmcdowell's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate gordonmcdowell's comment.
    in reply to qwertzu3 (Show the comment)

All Comments (49)

Sign in now to post a comment!
  • MrDisavowed

    Have you tried Smarter Money Maker? (look for it on google) It is a fast way to make extra cash quicker

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MrDisavowed's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate MrDisavowed's comment.
  • Brian Brown

    HUH...this is way better and less intrusive to just about everything and it lets us all live like royalty!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Brian Brown's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Brian Brown's comment.
    in reply to Joseph Krane (Show the comment)
  • youubar

    I'm not a huge fan of the graphite moderator, or the complexity of the salt recycle / electrolyzer circuit inside the containment. I still prefer the TerraPower design, but I support Flibe too.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate youubar's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate youubar's comment.
  • Tetrodioxide

    exactly! well-said. and a great movie btw.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tetrodioxide's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Tetrodioxide's comment.
    in reply to QuetzalcoatlCarnate (Show the comment)
  • pyrrho314

    I'm sold.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate pyrrho314's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate pyrrho314's comment.
  • OtakuBozu

    you mean that Thorium-232 is added, right?

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate OtakuBozu's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate OtakuBozu's comment.
    in reply to gordonmcdowell (Show the comment)
  • fireofenergy

    "Solar wont do the job, neither will wind, tidal power and geothermal are the only reliable renewables".

    Wrong! Solar and wind are the ONLY diffuse sources that could even rival FF's, given MACHINE AUTOMATION. Tidal and wave are just like biofuels, good for backyard projects but not good for sustaining 10 billion people at high standards. Solar is 50x "denser" than biofuels. It can be stored using molten metals and salt.

    Geo is like fusion, still fiction.

    I know LFTR is a million x better!

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fireofenergy's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate fireofenergy's comment.
    in reply to Vic Longdong (Show the comment)
  • Alex1SUN

    Doesn't sound like Flibe will attract any investors.

    This all sounds good, but I really doubt it will get any funding. Too much engineering required for new technology, too much fear associated with conventional nuclear industry, let alone new untested stuff. I am sure USA will not support this effort.

    I hope Chinese will be able to get LFTR online, but they also say that they have severe budget constraints.

    ·

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Alex1SUN's comment.

    Sign in to YouTube

    Sign in with your YouTube Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to rate Alex1SUN's comment.
  • Loading comment...
Loading...
Loading...
Working...
Sign in to add this to Watch Later