Kirk Sorensen - A Global Alternative (thorium energy via LFTR) @ TEAC4
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Published on Jul 8, 2012
http://thoriumremix.com/ Kirk Sorensen for harnessing the power of the atom using Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors (LFTR).
LFTR offers greater efficiency and safety over today's operating reactors, and even proposed light water / boiling water reactors. LFTR also provides spare processes heat and valuable isotopes as a byproduct of normal operation, something today's reactors can not, due to their low operating temperature.
Topics emphasized by Kirk at TEAC4:
- Economic and political situation of medical isotope production and applications.
- Use as a reliable energy production method of US military bases explained in their jargon.
- Desalination enabled by the high temperatures possible when using ionic salts instead of covalently bonded molecules to transfer heat.
Kirk Sorensen's talk was one of many at Thorium Energy Alliance Conference #4 in Chicago.
Kirk Sorensen is working on LFTR development at Flibe Energy: http://Flibe-Energy.com
-
Category
-
License
Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)
- Source videos Loading... View attributions
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
-
28:26
Motherboard TV: The Thorium Dream (Documentary)by MotherboardTVFeatured
129,632
-
29:01
THE THORIUM PROBLEM - Danger of existing thorium regulation to U.S. manufacturing and energy sectorby gordonmcdowell
48,478 views
-
34:08
ORNL Thorium Molten Salt Reactor Experiment Researchers - Dick Engel & Syd Ball - Dinner & Interviewby gordonmcdowell
6,129 views
-
19:44
Kirk Sorensen - Introduction to Flibe Energy @ TEAC3by gordonmcdowell
14,171 views
-
1:37:13
Kirk Sorensen @ MRU on LFTR - Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactorsby gordonmcdowell
30,485 views
-
1:03:43
The Quantum Conspiracy: What Popularizers of QM Don't Want You to Knowby GoogleTechTalks
299,508 views
-
1:59:59
Thorium Can Potentially Solve Our Energy Crisis - Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors (LFTR)by David Mclauchlan
4,662 views
-
39:21
Robert Hargraves - Thorium Energy Cheaper than Coal @ ThEC12by gordonmcdowell
4,337 views
-
1:22:09
Energy From Thorium: A Nuclear Waste Burning Liquid Salt Thorium Reactorby GoogleTechTalks
90,335 views
-
36:21
Global Warming vs LFTR - Thorium Energy to fight Climate Changeby gordonmcdowell
13,628 views
-
1:59:59
Everything you need to Know Nukeular reator Liquid fluoride thorium reactor Nuclearby steelrain420
2,033 views
-
19:46
David LeBlanc - Molten Salt Reactor Designs, Options & Outlook @ TEAC4by gordonmcdowell
3,692 views
-
20:13
David LeBlanc - Potential of Thorium Fueled Molten Salt Reactors @ TEAC3by gordonmcdowell
6,115 views
-
8:11
John Kutsch - Why of Thorium & the Way Forward @ TEAC4by gordonmcdowell
1,422 views
-
59:50
Aim High: Using Thorium Energy to Address Environmental Probby GoogleTechTalks
37,139 views
-
5:53
The Thorium Conspiracy - Stuff They Don't Want You to Knowby ConspiracyStuff
66,730 views
-
46:17
Kirk Sorensen Pre-lunch Chroma-key on 2012-06-08 @ Flibe Energyby gordonmcdowell
1,230 views
-
12:30
Thorium reactors and their feasibility: Thomas Drolet on Cambridge Houseby Cambridge House
2,802 views
-
10:21
The Future of Free Energy is here now! The end of oil, coal and nuclear pollution!by 77GSlinger
662,666 views
-
34:52
Bob Cywinski - Particle Accelerators and Thorium Energy @ ThEC12by gordonmcdowell
541 views
- Loading more suggestions...
Uploader Comments (gordonmcdowell)
Joseph Krane 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
"we live a life style that no people in history have even approached"
REALLY???
Well that depends on what values that life style expouses.
If one values Greed, waste, decadence, destruction of heritage and eco systems etc etc, then perhaps you need to re-evaluate HOW you assess this life style of yours?
Here we see an example of a corporate clown who stands to profit from a Thorium reactor being built somewhere in the USA (at tax paeys expense of course).
THe Sun is staring at you!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
gordonmcdowell 10 months ago
Joseph, this is the different perspective take on energy consumption. We use a great deal of stored energy (per capita and in total) compared to our ancestors. So if you want to mitigate our impact on the planet, we can consume less energy, consume it more efficiently, or consume CLEANER energy.
By pursuing CLEANER advances can be applied to emerging countries too... YOU use less energy? Great. But you are just you. India & China's middle class won't care, it is their turn for quality of life.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Justavian 10 months ago
I've seen him discuss this topic dozens of times, and i'm enamored with the idea that we could start heading in that direction. However, i'd like to see some kind of debate between Kirk and some of his detractors. I've seen lots of people mentioning the stumbling blocks - incredibly corrosive liquids, insufficient materials research for the reactor - Kirk doesn't address these things in detail. I want to believe Thorium is the godsend he says, but i'm worried we're glossing over something...
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
gordonmcdowell 10 months ago
We have some video dialog pertaining to corrosion, so as I'm working thru materials in chronological order eventually that will get posted. But I don't have any debate between Kirk and a (say) Rod Adams type person who's more keen on LWR (in fact Rod is keen on LFTR but thinks LWR is being maligned unfairly). I hope that can happen some day.
What's looking challenging is getting an anti-nuke to talk to Kirk. Anti-vs-Nuke debates do happen, but so far it has been out of my reach.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
qwertzu3 10 months ago
at 13:13 he says the current modell they are working contains Uranium 233 as a salt. I thought it would run on Thorium salts? I dont understand ...
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
gordonmcdowell 10 months ago
16:46 probably explains that best, in the slide you see Thorium-233 decays to Uranium-233 so the solution will contain both... Thorium-233 is added as fuel but it is Uranium-233 which fissions.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
All Comments (49)
MrDisavowed 1 month ago
Have you tried Smarter Money Maker? (look for it on google) It is a fast way to make extra cash quicker
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Brian Brown 1 month ago
HUH...this is way better and less intrusive to just about everything and it lets us all live like royalty!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
youubar 1 month ago
I'm not a huge fan of the graphite moderator, or the complexity of the salt recycle / electrolyzer circuit inside the containment. I still prefer the TerraPower design, but I support Flibe too.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Tetrodioxide 1 month ago
exactly! well-said. and a great movie btw.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
pyrrho314 2 months ago
I'm sold.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
OtakuBozu 3 months ago
you mean that Thorium-232 is added, right?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
fireofenergy 4 months ago
"Solar wont do the job, neither will wind, tidal power and geothermal are the only reliable renewables".
Wrong! Solar and wind are the ONLY diffuse sources that could even rival FF's, given MACHINE AUTOMATION. Tidal and wave are just like biofuels, good for backyard projects but not good for sustaining 10 billion people at high standards. Solar is 50x "denser" than biofuels. It can be stored using molten metals and salt.
Geo is like fusion, still fiction.
I know LFTR is a million x better!
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Alex1SUN 6 months ago
Doesn't sound like Flibe will attract any investors.
This all sounds good, but I really doubt it will get any funding. Too much engineering required for new technology, too much fear associated with conventional nuclear industry, let alone new untested stuff. I am sure USA will not support this effort.
I hope Chinese will be able to get LFTR online, but they also say that they have severe budget constraints.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube