Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Miskin Construction Scraper 1of5

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
38,574
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 19, 2008

Miskin construction scraper (part 1 of 5) introducing the pull scraper concept. Comparisons to self-propelled scrapers and articulated dump trucks. Explains unique top-loading features.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (miskinscraper)

  • You'll be surprised when you put a pencil to it. Each 627 carries 22 yards and burns 669 hp of fuel to load it. A train of Miskin D-19 scrapers carries 38 yards and only burns 400 hp of fuel to load. Email me and I'll send you a copy of Cat's own production study on 627G vs Miskin D-19 train behind a Bell 422hp tractor (we buried the Cat).

    I agree 100% about the operators! ...but they are hard to find.

see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • And you can send the farm tractor back to the farm when no dirt work, woo-hoo!!!!

    Token earthmovers in my book.

  • How bout it for Anthony's Laser Leveling top loading with an 8 yard bucket?

  • Anyway you have any more information on this? What is the price compared to the John Deere pans? With a 26 yard pan is there any way you can pull 3 pans with them or will they be to heavy? I would really like to get some more information on this to give to the owner of my Company. He recently purchased the new John Deere pans but is about to buy another 10 more of them. I would like to give him some more information on these pans. What setup pans can you over and in what price range?

  • The Miskin D-26 has a 14 ft cut, 26 yard, lighter tongue weight, and is quite a bit heavier built that the Deere pans. You should see an improvement loading rocks with a wider scraper, but still nothing works really well in rocks. As you know it is difficult to get traction, and with less then 50% dirt with the rocks, the load will not heap up very high. But still, a pretty inexpensive way to move rocks, even with the limitations.

  • The initial purchase price of the equipment is only one of many many cost associated with moving a yard of dirt. You can lower you fuel, labor and other costs significantly by using more modern, more efficient machinery.

  • i use old dw20 cat cabel ones they are cheeper then them ,

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more