@Canesnumber1stunner Russia had Shermans as well. The French Char was pretty much the best tank in the world at the outbreak of war, at least equal to anything the Germans had and superior to most German marks. The disaster with the French was the appaling tactical misuse of their armour. Likewise with the British in 1940.
@nyguy88L71 Ultimately, what makes a tank good is winning wars, you imbecile. You're obviously racist scum - one of Hitler's toy turds. The Tiger and Panther were so technically flawed they were a liability in tactical and strategic terms.
@nyguy88L71 The 40's or WW2? The end of WW2 saw the British Comet and the Centurion coming out and the huge and most powerful Stalin tank in the Soviet Union. Each was equal or superior to the Panther of Tiger, each of which were over-complicated, difficult for field maintenance and unreliable.
@Detoyato The Howitzter version of the KV-2 was classed as an "artillery tank" - pretty much a self-propelled gun but with a fully enclosed rotating turret. As such it had limited application and was not suited to infantry support, tank on tank combat etc.
Hi, errors excepted: The wheels and the small support wheels indicate it as a version of the PzKpfw III. The chassis of this type was used as the basis for more than 10,000 "Sturmgeschütze" (assault guns) without turret and armed with a 75 mm or 100 mm gun.
ha wohne in leipzig
GalaSachaci772 1 month ago
@noonsight2010 It was.... but that didnt stop it from being effective against tanks.
Detoyato 3 months ago
@halo07guy2 I was aware of that. The Russians must have improved on it as the Americans copied it back from the T34 post war.
noonsight2010 3 months ago
@Canesnumber1stunner Russia had Shermans as well. The French Char was pretty much the best tank in the world at the outbreak of war, at least equal to anything the Germans had and superior to most German marks. The disaster with the French was the appaling tactical misuse of their armour. Likewise with the British in 1940.
noonsight2010 3 months ago
@nyguy88L71 Ultimately, what makes a tank good is winning wars, you imbecile. You're obviously racist scum - one of Hitler's toy turds. The Tiger and Panther were so technically flawed they were a liability in tactical and strategic terms.
noonsight2010 3 months ago
@nyguy88L71 The 40's or WW2? The end of WW2 saw the British Comet and the Centurion coming out and the huge and most powerful Stalin tank in the Soviet Union. Each was equal or superior to the Panther of Tiger, each of which were over-complicated, difficult for field maintenance and unreliable.
noonsight2010 3 months ago
@Detoyato The Howitzter version of the KV-2 was classed as an "artillery tank" - pretty much a self-propelled gun but with a fully enclosed rotating turret. As such it had limited application and was not suited to infantry support, tank on tank combat etc.
noonsight2010 3 months ago
@noonsight2010 There was nothing new about the T-34's suspension. It was copied from Walter Christie's tanks that got exported to the Soviet Union.
halo07guy2 3 months ago
@rva1945 pretty sure just a stug3 with a long 75, no skirts
etzel33 3 months ago
@rva1945
Hi, errors excepted: The wheels and the small support wheels indicate it as a version of the PzKpfw III. The chassis of this type was used as the basis for more than 10,000 "Sturmgeschütze" (assault guns) without turret and armed with a 75 mm or 100 mm gun.
Cheers from Switzerland to Argentina!!
TheRusty58 3 months ago