Ron Paul vs. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz on Obamacare (2010 Flashback)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,435
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 28, 2012

Wasserman-Doltz and Ron Paul go at it on CNN over Obamacare, before it was passed.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Conservative1001BG)

  • HEY?? Rick Sanchez back on CNN. Was he forgiven?

  • @landlogger lol no. This was from February 2010.

Top Comments

  • ...getting deficits under control Debbie..hahaha..it's now at 15 trillion heading to 16....that's the Change people voted for...

see all

All Comments (80)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • i bet she has a rotten roast beef jew pussy

  • @147saad I'm Canadian as well, and I couldn't agree more

  • @idicula1979 no its not, he wants to get rid lobbying, which destroys your argument

  • @idicula1979 except Ron Paul isn't "FOR" the gold standard so your argument is un founded, your arguing a non truth

  • corporate greed ALONE!!!!! just like slavery was the SOLE reason for the civil war. single minded tunnel vision, what a woman, and what a joke

  • This bitch is stupid Ron Paul!!!!!!!!2012!

  • It's NOT in the bill Debbie!

  • @idicula1979 LEAVE ME ALONE YOU RON PAUL FAN BOY. I just want to leave you with an analogy that everyone can understand, you have a heard of a buyers/sellers market. Well Ron Paul America would be the ultimate have's/ have not America since gold and silver would be so rare (especially to us peasents) the have's could arbitrarily set the market to anything they desire and not just on big ticket item like house and cars but also everyday needs such as clothing or food.

  • @idicula1979 so detail where paul has voted to approve their lobby? but either way, it dont seem too many are happy with obama care. he dont want to cut government spending to 30s levels more so 2006 but your statements must scare you into thinking you need help. in four more years, your money is buying much less than now so have it your way where you think you are better off. Im gonna be fine choosing what i spend on wisely. insurance is whack anyway, some sicky is raising my price, i opt out.

  • @ranskye1 Look why do you think corporations lobby the government? It is to gain the upper hand. If you were not such a dumb fuck you would realize, if there was no government or a very weak government. Corperations could cut out the middle man and already have the upper hand on us who do not have the luxury of having large sums of money. What Ron Paul is advocating for the economy is the economy the we had in the 1930's.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more