@nicenonya3 What occured in Dealey Plaza at 12:30 pm on 11/22/63 is not a sideshow, it is the essence of the case. All the speculation about why he was killed is meaningless without the facts of the actual shooting. And after over 47 years there exists no evidence that anyone other than Oswald was involved in the assassination. For whatever reasons Judyth Baker wishes to inject herself into the conspiracy theories. But her story falls apart under even the slightest scrutiny.
@JohnDavidStutts1 READ HER BOOK<ASK HER,SHE'S ON FB,watch her clips,I don't care what you believe,remain ignorant of the facts, and keep dwelling on all the Dealy plaza sideshows of who did the shooting, instead of why JFK was killed!
@nicenonya3 Please tell me what makes her story believable? As I mentioned above, until Baker began telling her story, the idea of Oswald being involved with any woman other than Marina in 1963 was an idea that simply did not exist. The fact is, not even conspiracy theorists ever put forth the idea that Oswald had a mistress until Judyth Baker came along. But I guess we are just supposed to take Baker at her word. Why, because she weaved Bannister, Ferrie, Ruby and Shaw into her story?
@nicenonya3 Judyth Vary Baker's story is simply not believable. She took the one true fact, that she and Oswald were co-workers at the Reilly Coffee Company, and ran with it. The only time Judyth, or anyone remotely resembling Judyth, enters into the story is when she injects herself into it. No one corroborates Oswald having a mistress. She'd have been better off just saying she had a one night stand rather than concocting her fantastic tale of conspiracy and star-crossed lovers.
Look up Judyth Vary Baker,she will set you loner nutters straight...HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE TO COME FORWARD BEFORE YOU PULL YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASSES????
Too bad you haven't done all your homework,James Files tells the story that Oswald was with him in Mesquite,TX setting up the scope on his Remington fireball XP-100,Oswald never shot anyone,the only reason he had any nitrates on his hand was because Lee was holding the spent shells from the XP-100.LHO was getting change for his coke when the shots were fired,the woman who worked at the TSBD finally decided it was safe to tell her story,haven't read the latest book to get her ...
@nicenonya3 He tested negative on his cheek. He actually tested positive on his hands. The negative cheek result was to be expected. Why the Dallas PD ever did such a test is beyond me. There is no way that a bolt action rifle, such as the Carcano, will leave any paraffin on the cheek. The gases needed to leave nitrates are sealed in by the bolt. In any case, paraffin tests are basically worthless either way, and there is a mountain of solid evidence that proves Oswalds guilt.
@nicenonya3 What occured in Dealey Plaza at 12:30 pm on 11/22/63 is not a sideshow, it is the essence of the case. All the speculation about why he was killed is meaningless without the facts of the actual shooting. And after over 47 years there exists no evidence that anyone other than Oswald was involved in the assassination. For whatever reasons Judyth Baker wishes to inject herself into the conspiracy theories. But her story falls apart under even the slightest scrutiny.
JohnDavidStutts1 11 months ago
@JohnDavidStutts1 READ HER BOOK<ASK HER,SHE'S ON FB,watch her clips,I don't care what you believe,remain ignorant of the facts, and keep dwelling on all the Dealy plaza sideshows of who did the shooting, instead of why JFK was killed!
nicenonya3 11 months ago
@nicenonya3 Please tell me what makes her story believable? As I mentioned above, until Baker began telling her story, the idea of Oswald being involved with any woman other than Marina in 1963 was an idea that simply did not exist. The fact is, not even conspiracy theorists ever put forth the idea that Oswald had a mistress until Judyth Baker came along. But I guess we are just supposed to take Baker at her word. Why, because she weaved Bannister, Ferrie, Ruby and Shaw into her story?
JohnDavidStutts1 11 months ago
OSWALD NEVER SHOT ANYONE !!! damn you people are stupid!!
James Files has the story,only he isn't telling the whole story because he is still covering for those involved
nicenonya3 11 months ago
@JohnDavidStutts1 NOT BELIEVABLE to someone who doesn't have any braincells
nicenonya3 11 months ago
@nicenonya3 Judyth Vary Baker's story is simply not believable. She took the one true fact, that she and Oswald were co-workers at the Reilly Coffee Company, and ran with it. The only time Judyth, or anyone remotely resembling Judyth, enters into the story is when she injects herself into it. No one corroborates Oswald having a mistress. She'd have been better off just saying she had a one night stand rather than concocting her fantastic tale of conspiracy and star-crossed lovers.
JohnDavidStutts1 11 months ago
Lee Harvey Oswald Parafine test-NEGATIVE 0n youtube
nicenonya3 11 months ago
Look up Judyth Vary Baker,she will set you loner nutters straight...HOW MANY PEOPLE HAVE TO COME FORWARD BEFORE YOU PULL YOUR HEADS OUT OF YOUR ASSES????
nicenonya3 11 months ago
Too bad you haven't done all your homework,James Files tells the story that Oswald was with him in Mesquite,TX setting up the scope on his Remington fireball XP-100,Oswald never shot anyone,the only reason he had any nitrates on his hand was because Lee was holding the spent shells from the XP-100.LHO was getting change for his coke when the shots were fired,the woman who worked at the TSBD finally decided it was safe to tell her story,haven't read the latest book to get her ...
nicenonya3 11 months ago
@nicenonya3 He tested negative on his cheek. He actually tested positive on his hands. The negative cheek result was to be expected. Why the Dallas PD ever did such a test is beyond me. There is no way that a bolt action rifle, such as the Carcano, will leave any paraffin on the cheek. The gases needed to leave nitrates are sealed in by the bolt. In any case, paraffin tests are basically worthless either way, and there is a mountain of solid evidence that proves Oswalds guilt.
JohnDavidStutts1 11 months ago