Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Atheists vs. 9/11 Truther!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
101,338
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 11, 2008

Matt Dillahunty and Russell Glasser take on a 9/11 Truther.

Credit:
The Atheist Experience
http://www.atheist-experience.com/
2008/01/06 #534

  • likes, 367 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (5,740)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @TexasBlaineSaw ESB has a different structure than the WTC. Go into the ESB and you will see that the walls are made of brick, its structural fortification is on the insides, unlike the WTC outer support and the level of damage was not similar to that of the WTC

  • @roquefortfiles The Empire State building was hit by a B-2 Bomber, and received damage such as what happened to the Twin Towers. It stood. But I'm not here to argue. So 9/11 is not truly unique. I will admit that the difference besides the fall, is that 9/11 was deliberate and the ESB was not.

  • Hey Matt, the 3rd building was NOT hit by a plane. So if that is the reason that the other buildings came down the way they did "in your opinion", then how do you explain the the 3rd building coming down? I think there is a flaw in your reasoning. I am not a Truther so to speak but a realist. I don't believe the lies in the media in the same way I don't believe the lies in the bible. I usually respect what you have to say but I find you a little over zealous and bossy.

  • @roquefortfiles That's an excellent point.

  • You want to know what is not logical? Its not Logical to compare what happened on Sept 11th to ANY OTHER EVENT!!. What happened to these buildings was entirely unique to the day. You cannot cross reference this to XYZ building and say..."Well it burned all day and never collapsed".. No other buildings have had the amount and kind of structural damage these buildings received.

    There IS NO straight across comparison to ANY other situation. 911 was UNIQUE. It shares no precedent.

  • @KingDavid478

    I agree. My point is that truth in science is not a numbers game; it's possible to find an educated person who will support ANY claim.

  • @ClumsyRoot I can agree with that also. I never disagree with logic but wouldnt you agree that we saw the towers collapse and we didnt see anybody or anything created the earth 6,000 years ago. We got it on tape to be analyzed over and over again. Can you say that about the creation of earth 6,000 yrs ago?

  • @KingDavid478

    Sorry, but that's not how science works either. I could probably find 1,500 scientists who will insist that the earth is 6,000 years old.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more