iam sorry to say @ EsarHaddon , but assyria was never an empire , it was a kingdom , may be you should make research of how empires ( in genral ) ruled ? you will find 2 things in common : 1: the son ( prince always is succeeded after their father the king ) and 2nd: the king ( empiror ) is the sole leader by all means to the kingdom wich is also called empire . research more in assyrianology king lines and you shall find most of the kingship lines ? has nothing to do with blood lines ;) thanks
@rasheed1669 During the New Kingdom of Egypt, Nubia (Kash) was an Egyptian province, governed by the Viceroy of Kush. With the disintegration of the New Kingdom around 1070 BCE, Kash became an independent kingdom centered at Napata.[3]The Kushites buried their monarchs along with all their courtiers in mass graves. Archaeologists refer to these practices as the "Pan-grave culture"The Kushites also built burial mounds and pyramids,& shared some of the same gods worshiped in Egypt,
@rasheed1669 e Kingdom of Kush or Kush was an ancient Nubian state centered on the confluences of the Blue Nile, White Nile and River Atbara in what is now the Republic of Sudan.Established after the Bronze Age collapse &the disintegration of the New Kingdom of Egypt, it was centered at Napata in its early phase. After king Kashta ("the Kushite") invaded Egypt in the 8th century BC, the Kushite kings ruled as Pharaohs of the Twenty-fifth dynasty of Egypt for a century,
@rasheed1669 you real ignorant, sumerian was about 3rd millenium while the hellenistic &lydian was in differenr era , the lydian was contemporary the Medes & they fighing in halas battle in 6 century &hilliastic was in 1 cebtry,the lydian was ancient albanian while hillistic was greek & in last era of macadonia empire,read well and talk about midde east history,you talk about era the write was speanding in region and there were any one mention that hillenic was black skin & have relaion to kushs
@rasheed1669 lol you talk about sumer who they was from 3rd millenium to earlt 2 millenium , greek and roman was appearnt to stage of history in end of 1st millenium (332 BC that about greek while the roman appear with chistian era, there were gap 2000 year btween sumer and greek and romanian , you talk tell not history ,l mentin you india civilation there were cly tablet , to claim there where relation btween darvidiab and sumer
@rasheed1669 shortly the dervidian belong to Etheoea, and dont mix sumer and darvidian and ugarite and midderterrnian , l ask you the sumer invention writing (inscription clay tablet, ok where darvidian inscription clay tablet in india to support you claim , and where superian ecp mention same thing belong to him ancient memmory in india , l never seen any thing they mention same thing about him homeland
@rasheed1669 can you support you claim with same word to prove inguistic , then why they jump from south india to sumer and were other station btween that distance , l like you go retun to sumer encyclopedia to your knowledge , the sumer was indegenous peoples or descending from Zagros
@rasheed1669 where you sourse to that how namrud son of kush , its history not dream ? only you claim that l know well history of mesopotamia there weren't any sourse to sopport your claim , can you show your clain in oldtestment to sopport your dream haha
@rasheed1669 a Gutian dynasty persisted until the end of the 17th century BC,especially on the victory inscription of Utu-hegal of Uruk (c 2116-c. 2110). While Old Babylonian sources give the region between the Tigris and the Zagros Mountains as the home of the Gutians, these people probably also lived on the middle Euphrates during the 3rd millennium.in this early hisory there weren't mention of akkadian sp the Guti was had great role of sumerian,l ask you what mean (kur) in darvidian language
iam sorry to say @ EsarHaddon , but assyria was never an empire , it was a kingdom , may be you should make research of how empires ( in genral ) ruled ? you will find 2 things in common : 1: the son ( prince always is succeeded after their father the king ) and 2nd: the king ( empiror ) is the sole leader by all means to the kingdom wich is also called empire . research more in assyrianology king lines and you shall find most of the kingship lines ? has nothing to do with blood lines ;) thanks
AnunnakiThe1 1 week ago
fag kurd troll
\/
\/
kingbigdawg9 1 month ago
@rasheed1669 During the New Kingdom of Egypt, Nubia (Kash) was an Egyptian province, governed by the Viceroy of Kush. With the disintegration of the New Kingdom around 1070 BCE, Kash became an independent kingdom centered at Napata.[3]The Kushites buried their monarchs along with all their courtiers in mass graves. Archaeologists refer to these practices as the "Pan-grave culture"The Kushites also built burial mounds and pyramids,& shared some of the same gods worshiped in Egypt,
goran21715 2 months ago
@rasheed1669 e Kingdom of Kush or Kush was an ancient Nubian state centered on the confluences of the Blue Nile, White Nile and River Atbara in what is now the Republic of Sudan.Established after the Bronze Age collapse &the disintegration of the New Kingdom of Egypt, it was centered at Napata in its early phase. After king Kashta ("the Kushite") invaded Egypt in the 8th century BC, the Kushite kings ruled as Pharaohs of the Twenty-fifth dynasty of Egypt for a century,
goran21715 2 months ago
@rasheed1669 you real ignorant, sumerian was about 3rd millenium while the hellenistic &lydian was in differenr era , the lydian was contemporary the Medes & they fighing in halas battle in 6 century &hilliastic was in 1 cebtry,the lydian was ancient albanian while hillistic was greek & in last era of macadonia empire,read well and talk about midde east history,you talk about era the write was speanding in region and there were any one mention that hillenic was black skin & have relaion to kushs
goran21715 2 months ago
@rasheed1669 lol you talk about sumer who they was from 3rd millenium to earlt 2 millenium , greek and roman was appearnt to stage of history in end of 1st millenium (332 BC that about greek while the roman appear with chistian era, there were gap 2000 year btween sumer and greek and romanian , you talk tell not history ,l mentin you india civilation there were cly tablet , to claim there where relation btween darvidiab and sumer
goran21715 2 months ago
@rasheed1669 shortly the dervidian belong to Etheoea, and dont mix sumer and darvidian and ugarite and midderterrnian , l ask you the sumer invention writing (inscription clay tablet, ok where darvidian inscription clay tablet in india to support you claim , and where superian ecp mention same thing belong to him ancient memmory in india , l never seen any thing they mention same thing about him homeland
goran21715 2 months ago
@rasheed1669 can you support you claim with same word to prove inguistic , then why they jump from south india to sumer and were other station btween that distance , l like you go retun to sumer encyclopedia to your knowledge , the sumer was indegenous peoples or descending from Zagros
goran21715 2 months ago
@rasheed1669 where you sourse to that how namrud son of kush , its history not dream ? only you claim that l know well history of mesopotamia there weren't any sourse to sopport your claim , can you show your clain in oldtestment to sopport your dream haha
goran21715 2 months ago
@rasheed1669 a Gutian dynasty persisted until the end of the 17th century BC,especially on the victory inscription of Utu-hegal of Uruk (c 2116-c. 2110). While Old Babylonian sources give the region between the Tigris and the Zagros Mountains as the home of the Gutians, these people probably also lived on the middle Euphrates during the 3rd millennium.in this early hisory there weren't mention of akkadian sp the Guti was had great role of sumerian,l ask you what mean (kur) in darvidian language
goran21715 2 months ago