Robert Anton Wilson explains Quantum Physics

http://www.dedroidify.com
http://www.dedroidify.com/vids
http://www.dedroidify.com/realitytunnel

Any model we make does not describe the universe it describes what our brains are capable of saying at this time. All perception is gamble. We believe what we see and then we believe our interpretation of it we dont even know we're making an interpretation most of the time.

Translator: "She wants to know what Quantum Physics is..." *takes sip*
RAW: "WHAT?"
Translator: "Quantum Phsyics, explain it simply she asks"
RAW: "Explain Quantum Physics simply..."
Translater braces herself LOL but she has nothing to worry about because RAW explains it wonderfully

thanks to picturethefastlight
http://www.youtube.com/picturethefastlight

http://www.dedroidify.com
http://www.dedroidify.com/vids
http://www.dedroidify.com/realitytunnel

Category:

Education

Tags:

• robert
• anton
• wilson
• raw
• explains
• quantum
• physics
• mechanics
• reality
• tunnel
• belief
• system
• model
• map
• dedroidify

[remotevwr]

RAW is my favorite author; I've read 10 of his books. I think he would have found this electron cloud of discussion highly entertaining and a sort of proof of his presentation. Once when I heard him speak in Boston, he asked us how many surrealists it took to change a light bulb. The answer was two: one to hold the Zebra and the other to fill the bathtub with balloons. Fnord.

[octivator]

@ch3shirecat85 Boards of Canada - Zoetrope

[lefrebure]

@blapgatify Truth value? Can I assert any value of truth based on a theory of the irrelevance of logic? I think not. Can we arrive at truth based on the perception of logic? Only if the perception is absolute truth, thus negating perception/logic. It is quite the paradox unless we remove reason from the equation. So we must know it to be truth and we inherantly do. We only need find that truth which is not based on perception or reason/logic. In theory that is!

[blapgatify]

@lefrebure So how are you deriving any truth value from what it is you are saying? Does it just feel like it's true? Or are you using logic to say that logic is irrelevant?

[lefrebure]

@blapgatify Look before you leap! - Logical Leap before you look! - illogical

Knowing there is no reason to look or leap, logic becomes irrelevant. This is a hypothetical conversation as it relates to our physicality. Obviously, as physical beings logic is applicable, thus we try to apply it in every day uses. However, as sure as we see an atom occupy one space, we know it occupies multiple spaces, thus logic, when comparing atoms to humans is irrelevant.

[blapgatify]

@lefrebure Irrelevant to our existence compared to what? Compared to a lack of logic? Compared to spiritual practices? Compared to acting without purpose or meaning? To say that logic is irrelevant is to imply that it is irrelevant according to some standard. In other words "how" is it irrelevant. Without context you cannot conclude that logic is irrelevant because it depends. I'm asking you for context, or some kind of example to help me understand how logic is irrelevant as you see it.

[lefrebure]

@blapgatify Irrelevant to our existence. We should live instead of trying to figure out how to live or why we live. We dont try to breathe, we just do and as a result there is no need to apply logic. We should live our lives in the same manner. Logic only become relevant if we ask why?

[blapgatify]

@lefrebure Logic is irrelevant compared to what?

[lefrebure]

@blapgatify Logic is a byproduct of our creation, just as time and the number 2 is. Spiritually or metaphysically there is no need for logic and that was my point. I believe within all of us lies the truth and unless we can tap into that part of our existence we can never truly understand our existence. Logic is simply a device used to understand things physically, but metaphysically we already understand, whereby affirmation is not warranted. In truth, logic is inherant, thus irrelevant.

[blapgatify]

@lefrebure If no one's perception of logic is more accurate than another, then your argument that this is the case is no more accurate than mine to say that you are 100% incorrect about this. And logic does not exist. That is absolutely 100% true. That doesn't mean it's subjective or false or irrelevant. The number 2 doesn't exist either, but it is absolutely the case that 2 and 2 equal four as a consequence of it's internal consistency. That's all that logic is. It's not magical or spiritual.

[lefrebure]

To argue that one mans perception of logic is more accurate than another is inherantly illogical, unless it can be proven that man employs logic. We have no way of measuring whether or not we do thus, the entire conversation, as well as our existence is illogical. This is exactly what makes the argument so extremely important in understanding our creation and existence. If we can find logic in matter and energy not based on perception, we may find logic within ourselves.