Delta IV Heavy inaugural launch
Loading...
103,211
Uploader Comments (ugowar)
see all
All Comments (196)
-
And not a drop of 'pollution'. Hydrogen mixed with oxygen. H2O. Just some water vapour. An eco-friendly 900 ton-thrust booster. Brilliant.
-
how this rocket is kept straight during launch?
-
Liquid fueled rockets are soooo much better than crappy solid rocket fueled dumbed down rockets.
-
Damn!! The flames shooting out the end of the rocket at launch are massive!!!
-
@bweazel We care how anything else looks
-
@TooMuchGass Who gives a damn what it looks like, it's functional.
-
This rocket is ugly
-
At 1:26 it looks like a paintbrush!
-
Huge "Finger" gesture in the sky... It's beautiful
-
does hd cam's cost to much are what ? ?
Loading...
Can anyone get a higher quality of this video? Delta IV-H sure is a Badass booster!!
MattBlak1 1 year ago 12
@MattBlak1 That's what I'd like to know as well.
ugowar 1 year ago 4
@ugowar Yes! Good, Hi-Def footage of Delta IV-H seems to be rare, even non-existent. Its the booster that should always have been the one to launch the Orion spacecraft. In fact, Boeing says that if 5x corestages were strapped together with upgraded RS-68-B engines, Aluminium/Lithium tankage and an on-the-drawing-board 3x RL-10B2 powered upper stage: you'd get a booster that could put more than 60 tons into Earth orbit or throw 25+plus tons at the Moon or Mars. A cheap-ish Heavy Lifter, eh? :)
MattBlak1 1 year ago 4
@MattBlak1 Even more annoying than the lack of any good quality footage is the fact that out of the 4 launches that happened so far, 3 have been night launches. Of those 3, two were in cloudy/foggy weather. Visually, a bust. We shall see when the next Delta IV Heavy flies in January 2011 from Vandenberg, although they don't have as good trackers as the Cape does.
ugowar 1 year ago
Look at the puffs and plumes in the exhaust. If that happened to a SSME during a shuttle flight they would rebuild it and file a 3000 page report. I think that what has a lot to do with being man rated is being complete predictability, triple redundancy, and utter reliability. The Delta IV series isn't designed with that in mind.
lrodcantu 1 year ago
@lrodcantu It's designed to loft multibillion dollar national security spacecraft. Do you really think the shuttle SRBs for example are inherently safer than a liquid booster? When was the last time a liquid engine blew?
The puffs and sparks come from the RS-68 ablative nozzle and they're normal and *expected*. Since SSME is a regeneratively cooled engine, no debris should theoretically be released and that's why any observed flaring/sparking immediately raises question marks.
ugowar 1 year ago 4