Trinity Doctrine-UnBiblical & Confusing (Jeffrey R. Holland-Oct 2007 Conf).flv

Jeffrey R. Holland - Oct 2007 Conference, addresses the attacks on the LDS Church by others who have used the Christian creed doctrine of the Trinity as a (false) justification to call the LDS Church as "Non-Christian". Elder Holland addresses the Trinity Doctrine with actual historic fact, showing it is a false doctrine created by men, not God. Holland defends and protects the true doctrines of Christianity as preached by Christ in the New Testament.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Trinity Doctrine
• Triune God
• Nicene Council
• False doctrine
• Christian Creed Doctrine
• post New Testament doctrine
• doctrines of men
• false doctrine

[viewer087]

When listening to this video by Jeffery Holland, near the end he quoted the New Testament, the words from Jesus Christ himself. In accordance to the incomprehensible Trinity doctrine that says it is one God as three, what confusion it makes the words of Christ, which is God's word, of who was Christ addressing? Was he addressing himself, asking himself for grace? How foolish the Trinity doctrine has made the scriptures, confusing, contradictory and useless.

[viewer087]

"God must be beyond our comprehension". A statement from Michael Pea right after he claimed he cannot accept a believable explanation of God. His claim flies in the face of God's power, all knowing, infinite intelligence & ability to be able to explain himself in an understandable way. They made God impossible to relate to, distant, uninvolved & adorned mortal private interpretations (2 Pet. 1:20). Hence the doctrines of men, false & of the devil for he wants us to remain "confused".

[viewer087]

A video I watched made by Michael Pea, where he attempted to explain the Trinity doctrine to an ex-Mormon. The video title was "Please explain the Trinity? Bible Questions with Michael Pea". He started to claim God is incomprehensible. Then shortly after that (about 4.00 marker on the video), it became clear as to why he was confusing and could not explain the Trinity. This one statement he made, clearly shows the basic tenet other Christians follow. (continued-Pea)

[viewer087]

(continued-Pea) Pea said, & I quote, "I wouldn't believe an explanation of God that was believable". In other words, he accepted the premise of incomprehensibility & confusion, including a doctrine that is, itself, incomprehensible. They claim that is God's doctrine. God -never an author of confusion (1 Cor 14:33). Are we to learn about God and his Kingdom in a confusing way? Trinity doctrine & this man, Michael Pea, as good hearted he may seem, are not of God. Amen

[viewer087]

@bayreuth79 : Note: the Bible article on God was once a man, did not render properly in this comment forum. Here is the URL in parts, just put them together, which seems to work by blocking the URL with the cursor and paste it into the URL address field.

(URL below)

christian-truth

.blogspot

.com

/2012/01/

god-was-once-man-like-us

.html

[viewer087]

@bayreuth79 : learn-discern betwn personally generated feelings to those given by the Spirit. No other way a person receives a true witness from the Holy Ghost without "feeling" the inspiration. It's the basis to confirm it is from God. Feeling of stability, sureness, direction, & feeling "love", all good things of God. Read the Bible, are "ye past feeling" warns Apostle Paul & warns Nephi. Preaching doubt are you Bayreuth? - trying to sway me, who experienced God and his Spirit many times.

[viewer087]

@bayreuth79 : Do you believe in God? I mean truly believe and abide in him? If you disbelieve or have any doubt, then your words are moot because you are trying to get me to deny Christ and Heavenly Father which I will not do. All what you then say about Joseph Smith is merely the attempt to prove to me that God does not exist and the nit picking of my faith will fail you and your life instead. So do you believe in God, if so we can talk, but if you do not, then this battle of words is useless.