Carbon Dating, Can it be Trusted?

Can we trust Carbon Dating?

http://talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html#creacrit

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Science
• Geology

[gregrutz]

All of creationists crap has been debunked, Kent is the easiest.

[RedDawnJensen]

I wouldnt call it bashing. Warriorprince knew he couldnt argue against the logic so he started to just veer the argument onto spelling and namecalling, which didnt really matter. I hate it when I make a good point but someone shouts at me 'YOUR ARGUMENT IS BETTER THAN MINE BUT IM NOT GONNA ADMIT IT CAUSE YOU MISSPELLED A WORD!'

[Ethrock]

entire situation next time.

Also, my apologies for my misspelling of 'ineffective' in my prior post, as this might be taken as hypocritical considering my bashing of warriorprince1010 for his horrid grammar and spelling.

[Ethrock]

I did not feel like reiterating jzuidema's earlier points. Indeed there was absolutely no reason to, as this becomes too tedious and monotonous. There is a reason I did not clearly represent a comprehensible opposing position, and it is because I've done it too many times to too many people with such low calibers of generally functioning intelligence. Your point is valid as a broad study but innefective in this individual case of application. Thanks for your comment but please, be aware of the

[Ethrock]

You might notice that the arguments presented by this pseudo-intellectual have already been debunked, and if you read any of my comments to other people, or watched any substantial number of my videos you would know I am perfectly capable of arguing these points, and completely capable of admitting when I've been bested. I have no need to reduce to such juvenile tactics. I understand your point, but in this case it is not applicable. We are referencing someone who calls 'creation' science, and

[RedDawnJensen]

Grammar doesnt really matter that much. Although it is good to have correct grammar in an argument, what really matters is the point bieng made. If you start to veer away from the point and instead start to argue about how they are wrong just because of thier spelling, then that is usually a sign that you cant argue with the point that they are making and instead are coming back with anything that makes the other person look bad.

[Ethrock]

Also, eighth does not require that much effort to write out.

[jzuidema]

No I wasnt, just see what you say in the comment by replacing 'wasn't' with 'was', idiot. and this comment made me actually quite confident youre just a troll. The thing is, I dont mind commenting on trolls, so youd better find some other guys with which to have fun. Creation "science" (oxymoron) is the laughingstock of the academic world, everyone knows it, just troll something else. We celebrated darwin's birthday for a reason....have phun trolling, ignorant amoebe... :)

[warriorprince1010]

You were talking grammar and you got it wrong, end of debate, 8th of a wit. Creation remains the only scientific theory for the existence of life. We cannot date anything without secondary evidence.

[jzuidema]

Thats ok, I kinda got used to these stupid arguments they always try to make and well....sometimes its just fun to debunk everything they say, plus, it keeps my own knowledge about the subjects up-to-date.

Succes with making future videos... :)