CNN Video: 911 Inside Job Explosives Used 1st Time Said

Remember the NAME:

Professor Kevin Barrett

He is a modern day American Hero.

He is the first person I have heard on prime time mainstream news (CNN) tell everybody that 911 was an inside job.

He is a professor at Wisconsin University. And, He is a MAN who has spoken out about 911 being an inside job. In this clip, Professor Barrett says that demolitions were used to bring the towers down and that 19 men with box cutters could not have pulled off the event. He even states that Bin Laden worked for the CIA. He also states that bush did it to bring a 1000 year American imperical reich.

But, because of his bravery and love of the truth, Prof. Barrett is now under attack from the Wisconsin state government. They are pressuring the university to fire him. Alumni are also pressuring the school. Where is the love for knowledge, open debate, and discussion of controversial subjects??? Of course, CNN tries its best to discredit Professor Barrett and even uses terms like "crackpot" to put down the professor.

Luckily, the university and the students are backing Prof. Barrett, at least for now.

God Bless You Professor Barrett
Your name has now taken a place of HONOR in History...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• CNN
• WTC
• 911
• Government
• bush
• lies
• CIA
• Bin
• Laden
• Explosives
• New
• York
• Terrorism
• Iraq
• Nazi

[LUMIXG3]

cnn = cia

[Daddyo930]

@2000tc88 Good for you. Drinking too much will destroy your liver though. I guess that's probably another conspiracy theory.

[2000tc88]

@Daddyo930 For someone who thinks he is so well educated you have a very narrow mind. You say. "It must be considered as an option that explosives were used because no one can explain where the energy came from to reduce the building to rubble". That is on the verge of stupidity. The towers were turned to DUST that went up into the atmosphere. No CCD has EVER done that. You still cannot answer my questions. You are a waste of time. I wont bother replying to you again. I need a drink.

[Daddyo930]

@2000tc88 It's not my fault you were so poorly educated. Anyone cal easily google the first law of thermodynamics. The law states that energy can be transformed, i.e. changed from one form to another, but cannot be created nor destroyed. That means a cup cannot spontaneously explode because there is not enough potential energy in the cup for it to do that. It takes energy to destroy the cup. Is this too far over your head? Do you need to take some asprin?

[2000tc88]

@Daddyo930 Your right out there are`nt you,you ramble on about a planes speed,which had nothing to do with any of my comments.

Now it`s energy cannot be created,are you for real???.

Your first sentence is CRAP.

You are a waste of time.

[Daddyo930]

@2000tc88 The first law of thermodynamics says energy cannot be created or destroyed therefore there would not be enough potential energy in the building to reduce it to rubble. That's why your assertion of explosives being impossible cannot be correct. It must be considered as an option as no one can explain where the energy came from to reduce the building to rubble.

[2000tc88]

@Daddyo930 What has plane speed got to do with what I said.

I think the government know a LOT more than what they are telling,so does he.

If it was not a commercial airliner as you say, then what was it??

Why do you think he is right in saying it was a CCD.

I`ve told you why it was`nt.

[Daddyo930]

@2000tc88 Do you think the government had something to do with it? A 767's engines were not designed to achieve 420 knots at 700 feet therefore whatever hit the twin towers was not a commercial airliner. Examination of the facts will reveal the truth.

[2000tc88]

@Daddyo930 Is he,or do you just believe him.

To take down just one tower and virtually pulverise it would take approximatly 67 tons of explosives,how long do you think it would take to set that up.

If explosives were used why was there NO damage to nearby bldgs above the 20th floor,and why was`nt there bits of the towers found on the roofs of said buildings.

CCD it was not.

He`s probably right about the US government having something to do with it though.

[Daddyo930]

Kevin Barrett is right. Just prove him wrong. Debunkers can't.