Eric Hobsbawm on Gramsci's Marxism (1987) 1/7

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
24,492
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 19, 2009

Marxist historian Eric Hobsbawm lectures on the enduring relevancy of critical theorist Antonio Gramsci.

Doesnt get into the real meat until towards the end of part 3. Largely biographical before that but worth a listen to understand the nexus in which Gramscis thought emerged.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Gramsci

http://www.marxists.org/archive/gramsci/intro.htm

http://www.victoryiscertain.com/gramsci/

http://www.theory.org.uk/ctr-gram.htm

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • scrembo:

    "I would also point out that the ONLY prominent figure of the 20th Century to openly advocate any form of racial genocide was in fact a communist - Karl Marx!"

    I think this statement just points out to all the grownups in the audience the quality of scrembo's fare.

    Rabid, frothing idiocy.........

  • @scrembo You, Sir, are an idiot.

see all

All Comments (93)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @nikolgan They are both totalitarian. The spectrum on which the lie is not a straight line, but bent like a horseshoe. Hitler just replaced the idea of the vangard with the nation because he wanted differentiate himself with stalin. The red in the Nazi flag represents their socialist roots. What type of freedom do you refer to? Certain not individual freedom. Socialism inexorably moves toward large government and increased coersion. Big government equals little citizen.

  • @scrembo

    You are the one brainwashed one, friend.

  • Prominent figure of the 20th century. Haha, history is obviously not scrembo's strongest point. Not that Marx was the most tolerant person ever to exist, but he wasn't any better or worse than the average man in the 19th century.

  • @scrembo: We do forgive you. In fact, we feel sorry for you.

  • @scrembo you are "THINKPOL", man!

  • wow. marx didnt even live in the 20th century. not for a second.

  • @scrembo To continue, even in soviet union there was free health system, free education. Take a look in public care in capitalism. See the homeless people the unemployed.

    I can see that you know some ''socialists''. Well, let me remind you some others too, just for the discussion's sake..

    emiliano zapata, che guevara, αρης βελουχιωτης, luiza missel, gramsci, luxembourg, dolores ibarruri. See how they fought for liberty and what did it cost them..

  • @scrembo Who suggested Hitler enforced socialism? I said that fascism and socialism not only have nothing in common but also are exect opposites. Fascism is built on the nation, on the race (even the name derives from the latin verb fscio meaning bond around myself). Socialism is all about freedom. And you can see that in the way the communist manifest ends.

    Lenin and Mao were leaders in a civil war. (war against tsarism, and the kuomitang). I myself don't consider

    Pol pot or stalin as socialis

  • @scrembo Oh, I don't know, perhaps it's better to look at in terms of timescale. For how long did fascism (capitalism with it's claws out) exist ? Scale that up.

    & lets not forget that nobodies crimes exceed those of the British Empire............in absolute terms

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more