Stephen Meyer vs Michael Shermer parte 2

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,231
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 1, 2008

Stephen Meyer vs Michael Shermer - Debate sobre evolução vs Design inteligente realizado em 2005 no programa Faith Under Fire do Lee Strobel.

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 18 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (289)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Seigu007 Who admitted that? We make our own worth.

  • The "appearance of design" inference is as credible as the inference of solidity in matter. Which is to say, it is not.

    Just as we know that matter is comprised of atoms which are mostly empty space, when we examine the claims of ID in detail, the inference of design fails. Moreover, evolution by means of natural selection still provides a better and more comprehensive explanation of that which appears intelligently designed.

  • This is crap. Such pathetic lies and propaganda...

    Go read people. Don't let any of these people tell you things that are untrue. The evidence is OVERWHELMING. ID is a fraud. It's not supported, and not scientific. It's just rationalization.

    The information is out there. Educate yourself.

  • Respond to this video..Are we to assume, then, that your obscene and inane comments on these threads are representative of the "worthiness" of theists? LOL

  • @Seigu007 Yeah, we saw your obsession with "ass rape" on the other thread when you claimed the same thing. Yawn.

  • Given the evidence, when we don't have an answer we cry "God did it !"

  • I love how the religious say respect and accept your neighbor but it always come down to if they agree with my ideas no acceptance and evolution is still best idea out there just lets and some design with it

  • ROFL Shermer got slutted. This is pure gold!

  • atheists are worthless and irrelevant by their own admission.

  • @Law19157 The editor didn't have his contract renewed because of his failure to follow peer review procedure. Unlike all the other papers published the claimed reviewers have not been identified.

    ‘Creation science has not entered the curriculum for a reason so simple and so basic that we often forget to mention it: because it is false, and because good teachers understand exactly why it is false. ’ [Stephen Jay Gould, The Skeptical Inquirer]

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more