The Ground of Reason has Aseity: God

God has aseity and is the ground for truth:

I do recommend this Book - I bought it at
Mike A Robinson.com

It refutes Sam Harris' book Letter to a Christian Nation and it disproves the Brights.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• God
• lee
• stroble
• edgar
• presuppositional
• evolution
• greg
• bahnsen
• cornelius
• van
• til
• plantinga
• gordon
• clark
• john
• frame
• butle

[OntoLogos]

Yes, and the Law of Identity that you utilized requires theism.

[OntoLogos]

No.

A particular mind cannot account for a universal.

One has to have full aseity and omniscience to account for a universal.

What is your non-theistic source? there is none.

[OntoLogos]

The denial of theism leaves one without an ethical or epistemic rudder. Non-theists adopt positions that disallow certainty, necessity, and universality, but this must surrender not just the Laws of Thought, but epistemology, philosophy, and ethical law.

[OntoLogos]

If one denies universals in a universal manner, you as a non-theist stultify yourself: it's a self-defeating position. There must be universals, to ground universals one must have a universal rational bedrock and source that has thus communicated, your autonomy is infinitely deficient.

[OntoLogos]

The Laws of Logic are:

The Law of Contradiction: A = A and not Non-A in the same manner.

The Law of Identity: A = A in the same manner.

An apple is an apple and not an orange in the same manner.

A chair is a chair.

These Laws must be employed in all one asserts, says and does.

I (A) address you (non-A).

I (A) am me (A).

These universal invariants require the universal invariant God.

[Goddoesexist]

If true moral law is it's good for the strongest to survive, let the weak grovel & die.- If there isn't a morality decreed by God, then logically the strongest should exploit and take advantage of the weak. To be a consistent atheist/evolutionist, one should close down the assistance programs & the schools for the blind, handicapped, and kill off all the weak.

God alone gives an immutable Moral Law. God lives.

[Goddoesexist]

God alone has the epistemic credentials to ground the universals of the Laws of Logic (you must use in weighing the evidence) and the Moral Law (which you must use in your analysis of wrongs in the world).

Everything is proof for the existence of God, everything, plus there is tons of a posteriori evidence too.

[Goddoesexist]

Unanswered Questions, dilemmas, paradoxes do not disprove the existence of God. Particulars and a posteriori evidence lacks the epistemic status to refute universals.

[picassoui]

An apple is an apple a chair is a chair its true . these things exist whether we believe them or not . But what gives us their identity in our minds ? Our perception of these things .

If youre perception is flawed then you will not percieve these things in their true nature .

A clearer revelation must be had in order for you to percieve them clearly.

[mrAndersen72]

Universals are constructs of the human mind which differs among cultures and in time.

[sonic8005]

Oh man, you have no idea what "the laws of logic" or any of these laws mean, nor do you care about the fact that these have nothing to do with your religion's beliefs... this is a mindless attack an Atheists, at bests. So mindless, that basically, you could be telling them all to become Muslims... because "Allah" can "account" for them, because it's theism, as can Zuess and many other random deities.

The problem is: none of these laws come from theism.

[Goddoesexist]

I agree.