Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin - Origin of Species - Evolution Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munich universities ! Creation proved by Scientists ! Part 1 / 7

Intelligent Design proved by - Biologists, Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munchen - debating and refuting Evolution Theory ! Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin - Origin of Species - Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists !

Creation proved by Scientists !

Please watch all parts of this movie:

Part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4z0IVivslc

Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO7gV41PNcA

Part 3:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=og-ll0SZXNk

Part 4:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NQTMfG4FB4

Part 5:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpNt8d2jgSU

Part 6:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQh1E_jT8iw

Part 7:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj3PWUF7zAw

Thank you for watching !


Tags: % can science prove that evolution in wrong? %* can science prove Existence of God? New York Times can science prove the the - universe was created? () (_)can science prove creation? can science disprove God? can science disprove creation? can science disprove evolution? Who created the universe? % What created the universe? Is Richard Dawkins right *%$ wrong about evolution? Is Charles Darwin right *%$ about evolution? How did everything begin? How did everything start? Is there a God who created the earth? Is there a God who created the universe? Do we %_ -,- % know everything about evolution? Tags (-): Do we know everything about creation? %* Is there a proof of creation? % Is there anybody out there? Is the truth is out there? Can we rely on science . regarding the evolution? Can we rely on Bible regarding the creation? Can we understand the creation of all things? ^*%$ Can we understand the evolution of all things?

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• architecture
• structure
• function
• protein
• living
• cell
• aminoacids
• critic
• toxin
• biology
• mistery
• darwin
• charles
• refuted
• not
• true
• biochemic
• chemistry
• tissue
• organic
• inorganic
• richard
• dawkins
• book
• God
• Delusion
• lie
• life
• begin
• by
• chance
• pajaro
• dunes
• fundamental
• origin
• of
• evolving
• Christoffer
• Hitchens
• tree
• on
• earth
• engine
• creation
• complex
• complexity
• atheism
• atheists
• agnostic
• live
• cultural
• vs
• evolution
• theory
• compact
• learn
• best
• debate
• logic
• pragmatic
• pragmatism
• nobel
• laureates
• Darwinian
• Theory
• falsity

[Arkyne88]

@Znybar No. I'm completely serious.

It's like this: Jesus loves humanity so much that He shortens lives so that we do not have enough time to make up our minds as to whether or not He exists.

He wants people to go to hell, that's why He doesn't provide better evidence of Himself. It's all part of his plan to sabotage the "untrue" Christians. They were doomed from birth you see, they were never TRUE Christians.

[Spandex08]

@sm0ville God is impossible you stupid retard. You don't know even what it is you believe in some stupid shit like the bible which were stories to scare people and you were taught and influenced by your parents and community to believe in god - thats how much brain you have. Evolution is true, but life sprawning in a random event is impossible too. So someone must have planted the seeds - until science comes up with explanations i will believe that it must have been another alien civ

[Znybar]

@Arkyne88 I can't figure out whether this is sarcasm or serious. You never know with the religious...

[Arkyne88]

@Znybar Don't you get it, dumb skeptic? The flaws are put there to punish humanity.

Jesus loves all of us so much he decided we should have a terrible design. Try thinking with a "logical" brain next time you post something! Or whatever you morons call that thing rattling around in your skull!

[zoroisabeast]

Im not going to watch this because wht most Christians call proof is the bible or the cross

[Znybar]

@villontre Ok, if you were to design a camera, would you put a hole in the lens, put a few layers of opaque tissue in front of it? No, unless you had a strange desire to have a bad picture. The fact we see 'well' is not related to the efficacy of its design, because we have nothing to compare our vision to (classic anthropomorphising). Basically, yes, the eye works for our purposes. But if god is all-knowing, surely he wouldnt include all these evident engineering flaws?

[villontre]

@Znybar Au contraire, I never said that the eye is flawed and inferior. You began this whole thing by saying that the human eye was the: " Most flawed piece of hardware ever created." And I am telling you that this sort of mentality only comes from someone like Dawkins and others that are constantly trying to find flaws in a perfect design such as the human eye (O).

[Znybar]

@villontre So what is your point exactly? You admit that the design of the human eye is flawed and inferior? How does this in any way support intelligent design? I would say it's unfair to include 'millions of species of microbes' that don't actually have nor need eyes, and I contest your comment on insects, which can see in the ultraviolet/infared spectrum (which humans don't btw). And he also designed an eye that is prone to developmental issues as well as environmental impacts?

[villontre]

@Znybar And yes, I am an American idol. Most people with 20/20 and normal eye vision are completely satisfied with the way their eyes are built, backwards and upside-down. Humans do have better eye vision than millions of species of insects, microbial life forms, deep water fish, etc. The reason that some people are born blind is usually due to problems during different stages of human eye development, it has nothing to do with the design of the eye itself.

[Znybar]

@villontre And what about all the people born blind? Or the children in africa who get simple eye infections curable by one drop of antibiotic who never get it and go blind? What a loving god...