Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin - Origin of Species - Evolution Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munich universities ! Creation proved by Scientists ! Part 1 / 7

Intelligent Design proved by - Biologists, Scientists from Cambridge, Chicago, Munchen - debating and refuting Evolution Theory ! Scientists presents Proof of Intelligent Design ! Charles Darwin - Origin of Species - Disproved, Refuted by Biologists and Scientists !

Creation proved by Scientists !

Please watch all parts of this movie:

Part 1:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4z0IVivslc

Part 2:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YO7gV41PNcA

Part 3:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=og-ll0SZXNk

Part 4:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3NQTMfG4FB4

Part 5:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zpNt8d2jgSU

Part 6:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQh1E_jT8iw

Part 7:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj3PWUF7zAw

Thank you for watching !


Tags: % can science prove that evolution in wrong? %* can science prove Existence of God? New York Times can science prove the the - universe was created? () (_)can science prove creation? can science disprove God? can science disprove creation? can science disprove evolution? Who created the universe? % What created the universe? Is Richard Dawkins right *%$ wrong about evolution? Is Charles Darwin right *%$ about evolution? How did everything begin? How did everything start? Is there a God who created the earth? Is there a God who created the universe? Do we %_ -,- % know everything about evolution? Tags (-): Do we know everything about creation? %* Is there a proof of creation? % Is there anybody out there? Is the truth is out there? Can we rely on science . regarding the evolution? Can we rely on Bible regarding the creation? Can we understand the creation of all things? ^*%$ Can we understand the evolution of all things?

Category:

Nonprofits & Activism

Tags:

• architecture
• structure
• function
• protein
• living
• cell
• aminoacids
• critic
• toxin
• biology
• mistery
• darwin
• charles
• refuted
• not
• true
• biochemic
• chemistry
• tissue
• organic
• inorganic
• richard
• dawkins
• book
• God
• Delusion
• lie
• life
• begin
• by
• chance
• pajaro
• dunes
• fundamental
• origin
• of
• evolving
• Christoffer
• Hitchens
• tree
• on
• earth
• engine
• creation
• complex
• complexity
• atheism
• atheists
• agnostic
• live
• cultural
• vs
• evolution
• theory
• compact
• learn
• best
• debate
• logic
• pragmatic
• pragmatism
• nobel
• laureates
• Darwinian
• Theory
• falsity

[Znybar]

@villontre Ok, if you were to design a camera, would you put a hole in the lens, put a few layers of opaque tissue in front of it? No, unless you had a strange desire to have a bad picture. The fact we see 'well' is not related to the efficacy of its design, because we have nothing to compare our vision to (classic anthropomorphising). Basically, yes, the eye works for our purposes. But if god is all-knowing, surely he wouldnt include all these evident engineering flaws?

[villontre]

@Znybar Au contraire, I never said that the eye is flawed and inferior. You began this whole thing by saying that the human eye was the: " Most flawed piece of hardware ever created." And I am telling you that this sort of mentality only comes from someone like Dawkins and others that are constantly trying to find flaws in a perfect design such as the human eye (O).

[Znybar]

@villontre So what is your point exactly? You admit that the design of the human eye is flawed and inferior? How does this in any way support intelligent design? I would say it's unfair to include 'millions of species of microbes' that don't actually have nor need eyes, and I contest your comment on insects, which can see in the ultraviolet/infared spectrum (which humans don't btw). And he also designed an eye that is prone to developmental issues as well as environmental impacts?

[villontre]

@Znybar And yes, I am an American idol. Most people with 20/20 and normal eye vision are completely satisfied with the way their eyes are built, backwards and upside-down. Humans do have better eye vision than millions of species of insects, microbial life forms, deep water fish, etc. The reason that some people are born blind is usually due to problems during different stages of human eye development, it has nothing to do with the design of the eye itself.

[Znybar]

@villontre And what about all the people born blind? Or the children in africa who get simple eye infections curable by one drop of antibiotic who never get it and go blind? What a loving god...

[Znybar]

@villontre You're an idiot? 20/20 vision? 90 percent of animals have much better vision than we do. Your god must love us indeed if he gave us a shitty pair of eyes compared to, say, a cuttlefish. When I said flawed, I meant in design. Look at a bit of anatomy, the eye is built backwards and upside-down. I was simply stating it because its an example often used by intelligent design for people to say 'look! that couldn't have evolved its too perfect!'.

[villontre]

@Znybar You said that the human eye is the "Most flawed piece of hardware ever created. If it is intelligent design, your god is a retard."

And yet millions or perhaps even billions of people around the world have 20/20 vision. Your dislike for Intelligent design and God is making you blind to reality.

[sm0ville]

@Znybar I wasn't trying to prove that a God exists. I was merely trying to state the fact that Darwin's Theory of Evolution cannot be true applying his rules to the evidence provided in these videos. There must be some other explanation!!

[Znybar]

@sm0ville and until YOU can prove there is a god, don't hold an argument. Religious people have the burden of proof, not the secular among us.