Debating SEDEVACANTISM--afterthoughts and a brief examination

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
442 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 23, 2009

It took me a while to get this up, and I still haven't had time to load the MP3s up to my OWN servers. Download them from Peter Dimond's server first

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/mp3/1_V2_apopes_debate_with_Albrecht.mp3

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/mp3/2_V2_apopes_debate_with_Albrecht.mp3

http://www.mostholyfamilymonastery.com/mp3/3_V2_apopes_debate_with_Albrecht.mp3

This is a brief examination of some of the points that Peter Dimond just DID NOT get and probably never will.

GOD BLESS you!

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 5 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (35)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The "Whore of Babylon" actually refers to Pre-Christian Rome !!!!!

  • The "Whore of Babylon" actually refers to Pre-Christian Rome !!!!!

  • When the Dimond bros call the RC church "The Whore of Babylon" (TWOB)they again reveal thier prejudicial ignorance. TWOB properly refers to PRE-Christian Rome. Get it right you evil venom spewing dummies (No not you; THEM). Making millions from their venom spewing.

  • Sedevacantists are schismatic and excommunicated .“By withdrawing submission from the Holy Father and the faithful in communion with him, Sedevacantists are schismatic and hence automatically excommunicated from the Church under both Divine and ecclesiastical law (canon 1325, par. 2).”

  • @romeusurped58

    Can you not debate with someone without stooping to childish name-calling? How many times are you going to use the word "Idiot" and " moron"?

  • I am asking you a question sir. We've already dealt with Florence and De Defectibus for almost 3 hours. I am asking you a question. Do you think my Patristic references on the words of consecration were spurious as Peter Dimond thought?

  • Sir, are you claiming, as Peter Dimond, that my Patristic quotations were spurious?

  • Last I checked, it was me dealing with INFALLIBLE DECREES---namely from TRENT, and from the Scriptural texts namely. It was also ONLY MYSELF that dealt with the Patristic sources. So before you think I am denying the Faith, and before you call me all the vulgarities you love, listen carefully. I know you have a lot of hatred and anger vent up in you, and I will pray for you. I just find it sad that you are so angry at Peter's performance that you must curse me. GOD BLESS you.

  • Maybe calm down a tad bit? If you're upset that Peter Dimond performed so poorly, take it to him--please

  • I take it you're furious at the performance of your hero Mr. Dimond in the NOVUS ORDO DEBATE. I'd be upset if I were part of the Sedevacantist camp too. I'd be surprised if he ever debates me again.

  • Loading comment...
Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more