Media Coverage and the Election: Did it Make any Difference?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
809 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 7, 2009

CBS senior political correspondent Jeff Greenfield discusses how the 2008 election was covered in the mainstream media, the full-throated emergence of new media (whose impact was real but vastly overrated), and how "real" events drove the outcome. He posits that this election, like many (but not all) past ones, was shaped by political factors that were largely outside the media's sphere of influence Series: Carsey-Wolf Center for Film, Television, and New Media at UCSB [9/2009] [Public Affairs] [Show ID: 17094]

Category:

Education

Tags:

Download this video

LICENSE: Creative Commons (Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works).

For more information about this license, please read: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/.

High-quality MP4 Learn more

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • It would be an improvement if this were edited to get rid of the babbling idiots doing the interminable introductions of people no one cares about.

  • It was interesting what Noam Chomsky had to say about this guy.

see all

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • yeah it's like seeing bad acting part of semi-porn.

  • To be clear, I am not pushing the notion that Obama got elected by the media, by no means. I simply stating the painfully obvious, though easily glossed over FACT that the media may and DOES choose to omit not only key information, but also key images, that could quite easily tell a more full holistic story of what is actually going on in the world today. Instead, we get watered down, insultingly dumbed-down information. Don't be fooled by this guys rhetoric. News media influences everything

  • Furthermore, this guys contentions are so blatantly influenced by the same media he has worked for. To be blunt, lets get real here. OFCOURSE mainstream tv news influences elections. The issue is less whether they influence elections one way or another..the problem is that they provide unprecedented weak, pathetic, context lacking information. It isn't what the media DOES day..it is what they consciously choose to omit in order to save make money for their advertisers and corporate comrades.

  • Lets come off this idea that the media is somehow leftist. The content and stories that fill the airways of CNN, FOX MSNBC etc. are at the very most mildly influenced by these apparently closet-liberal journalists and reporters. Of course, at the end of the day information is controlled only by CEOs, presidents, and the higher-ups. IE the Ruper Murdochs of the world (perhaps not all so extreme) but still, WASPS fiscal conservatives nevertheless. Dig deep enough, and all media is conservative.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more