Used To Be Pro-Choice Donald Trump Clueless About a Woman's Right To Privacy in Roe v. Wade

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,510
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (politicalarticles)

  • A woman's liberal courts granted 'right' to not be pregnant, cannot possibly supersede the child's true right, to not be killed. FACT: Each and every legal surgical abortion in America today, stops a beating heart. What is the most selfish act a woman could ever perform? 1) Taking her own life. 2) Taking the life of her own child. If you are 'pro' or in favor of a woman's 'right' to kill her children, then you are without question: Pro Death

  • @truthinreality -- When it comes to killing convicts, I bet you are pro death penalty!

  • she is implying you can't be against abortion and for privacy, not true.If someone kills another in the privacy of their own home are they not to be prosecuted because it was in their"private"home and the law would interfere with their"right to privacy."I believe in privacy but it is no private matter to take the life of another.God made each individual in the womb and thus all human life is sacred.They are unborn,not unhuman.If they're not human than what does an abortion prevent from existing?

  • @epiultra -- God doesn't exist. He never did . . . he never will. The concept of God is a fairy tale, a scam -- so that suckers like you can be reigned in and controlled. The belief that some imaginary spook living in a paradise in the sky will deposit you in some fiery pit if you abort an unwanted baby is pure baloney!

  • @politicalarticles God loves you :D

  • @CpsLock3 -- It seems like this GOD, whoever he/she is loves only a portion of the world. If he/she were so powerful and loved everyone equally -- there would be no wars, no famine, no racism -- and most important no terroristic Republicans .....and Mr. 'I Slaughtered 1 million Iraqis' Bush would note be sitting in Dallas sipping the best wine!

see all

All Comments (36)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • idiot

  • a) Privacy is entirely the wrong word, bodily autonomy better describes the issue at the heart of the abortion debate

    b) Bodily autonomy is pretty much constitutionally guaranteed, in terms of freedom to do this and that. However it conflicts with laws against murder. Now if you don't think a fetus is a human being then abortion's fine any day. But if you do, then you find yourself in an awkward position asking which law trumps which (no pun intended), but usually it goes against abortion

  • @politicalarticles I knew that would piss you off.

  • @epiultra Your moral views are your own, and I respect them. But your conception of what "privacy" means is not the correct one when you hear the term "right to privacy" in the legal context. Once again, I speak on this issue from a purely legal perspective, without any discussion of God or morality. In this video, or whenever you hear the term "right to privacy", I'm just letting you know, that your conception of it is not what they are speaking of.

  • dak879

    all men are CREATED equal, the first settlers to America were missionaries to bring the Gospel here,but you probably wont find that in a public school text book since they want us to forget our history in order to change our future. and privacy is intimate, so murder of a baby is intimate?? where's the baby's "privacy" was it privacy to kill Jews in camps since it was out of public view? like it or not,all will answer to God for their sins and whether or not they accepted Jesus.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more