We Are change victoria talks to Jack Layton about war crimes and Bilderberg group

and depleted uranium. du. - watch in HQ
here we are , kickin' ass, takin' names !
Jack responds to depleted uranium, and privacy concerns. we sure wrecked that Randall Garrison crowning event, huh, guys ? I kno there was some additional stuff with Lana popham, etc, but hey, 6 min.s is plenty min.'s. a'ight. Ii was thininking of including the part w where he discusses a nationwide poverty strategy, and schools, but the file was getting big and unweildlly, soo ... .... yeah, good times.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• wac
• victoria
• we are change
• Randall Garrison
• jack Layton
• ndp
• truth
• 9/11
• infowars

[Tailypoe777]

wwhyy is it so darrk ? ? ? ? ? ?

[Tailypoe777]

Yeah. yeah.

[echoandi]

Jack still supports the "Official US government conspiracy theory "about the events of 9/11. Even though he claims to be a friend of 9/11 scholar Barrie Zwicker!

.

Thumbs up if you would like to kick Jack Layton in the balls!

[echoandi]

@StephaneGroulxTV

The first step is to get the lying sacks of shit to answer some tough questions on camera, then you can show people that they contradict themselves regularly. Bending with the wind, as they say.

Keep asking the tough questions on camera, and hold them accountable for their lies!

Keep up the great work, WE ARE CHANGE Victoria!

[mirlin235]

@mbonter1 You'd be very surprised how many countries actually don't use it, the only major countries that use it are, England, US, I believe Iran has som form of it, again I believe this country has a form of it, but Germany, France has it, and Russia, China I don't think has the capility yet, but that may change in the next few years

[mbonter1]

@mirlin235 Well that's somewhat comforting but still sucks to know we're supplying to those who do use it in bombs.. the stuff never goes away. That together with how we export asbestos knowing it'll very likely cause cancer where it's used and you can see what Canada's priority is money. Ethics anyone?

[mirlin235]

@mirlin235 The DU issue though, has been going on for years, most members o our military wouldn't want to use it, nor would they, the only few weapon systems that can use it, are like I stated a RCAF CF18 Hornet, or our Leopard tanks, however, with they'r age and the way that they have both been maintained I doubt they could even use one, those aircraft and tanks are almost 30 years old, I think it would hurt the system more than the enemy, just saying..I hate DU and think it should be out law'd

[mirlin235]

@mbonter1 I knew that, but we have NEVER used it ourselves, being somebody who comes from a military backround, and who has seen almost all the weapons our CURRENT military force use, and can use, we wouldn't be able to use DU, our aircraft could carry it, but it would be very unlikely that a Canadian fighter jet flying over Libya would, plus, in most cases we were doing Anti air patrols, on very few occasions would RCAF be used for a CAS mission, it did happen though....>

[mbonter1]

What's up with this dizzy bitch handler he's got trying to interrupt everybody and lead him away from controversial questions in a mad rush?

[mbonter1]

@mirlin235 Ya.. Canada's only one of the biggest SUPPLIERS of DU for the US to use in making the bombs and we prolly dropped a few of them ourselves in Libya. No biggie.

[mbonter1]

Seems to me that if Layton was supporting David Suzuki (who pretends to be an environmentalist but won't talk about geoengineering/chemtrails) and said that humans cause climate change (which we know is false because climategate was based on falsified science) then he was either ignorant of the truth or perpetrating a fraud.

[KrookedSaint]

If you're going to run around with a video camera and make films like this, please learn how to use a camera. It will build a professional, more credible basis for your future projects. Seriously. Amateur video does VERY little to sway people's opinion. Keep it up, but build your media skills.

[SmokeyBottle]

This is the same question I'd like to ask Jack as well, so thank you for posting. I liked his answer without going into a lengthy discussion. He does have to keep it relevant and the antidote regarding flaherty's private meetings does bring the transparency of the conservatives into question.

I like how jack disarms the guy waving his finger in Jacks face simply with his calm demeanor, self control and logical reasoning.