Banned College Lecture! U.S False Education Exposed, Hosea 4:6: My People Die From Lack Of Knowledge

America is a country that lies to their children and hides the fact we live under evil elite families(WHO CONTROL OUR MONEY THROUGH ILLEGAL FEDERAL RESERVE) who own everything and have a monopoly on our economy...they also destroyed our farmers(WE MUST BRING BACK FARMERS BCUZ THEIR IS NOT ENOUGH JOBS FOR EVERYBODY) and the elite spit in our ancestors and our face by saying we are in debt after they stole all the money and gold...WAKE UP AMERICA!! WE HAVE BEEN LIED TO AND WE ARE NOT IN DEBT!!! .....The Four Horsemen of Banking (Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Citigroup and Wells Fargo) own the Four Horsemen of Oil (Exxon Mobil, Royal Dutch/Shell, BP Amoco and Chevron Texaco); in tandem with Deutsche Bank, BNP, Barclays and other European old money behemoths. But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch. But their monopoly over the global economy does not end at the edge of the oil patch. According to company 10K filings to the SEC, the Four Horsemen of Banking are among the top ten stock holders of virtually every Fortune 500 corporation. So who then are the stockholders in these money center banks? CPA Thomas D. Schauf corroborates McCallister's claims, adding that ten banks control all twelve Federal Reserve Bank branches. He names N.M. Rothschild of London, Rothschild Bank of Berlin, Warburg Bank of Hamburg, Warburg Bank of Amsterdam, Lehman Brothers of New York, Lazard Brothers of Paris, Kuhn Loeb Bank of New York, Israel Moses Seif Bank of Italy, Goldman Sachs of New York and JP Morgan Chase Bank of New York. Schauf lists William Rockefeller, Paul Warburg, Jacob Schiff and James Stillman as individuals who own large shares of the Fed. The Schiffs are insiders at Kuhn Loeb. The Stillmans are Citigroup insiders, who married into the Rockefeller clan at the turn of the century. J. W. McCallister, an oil industry insider with House of Saud connections, wrote in The Grim Reaper that information he acquired from Saudi bankers cited 80% ownership of the New York Federal Reserve Bank- by far the most powerful Fed branch- by just eight families, four of which reside in the US. They are the Goldman Sachs, Rockefellers, Lehmans and Kuhn Loebs of New York; the Rothschilds of Paris and London; the Warburgs of Hamburg; the Lazards of Paris; and the Israel Moses Seifs of Rome.

The control that these banking families exert over the global economy cannot be overstated and is quite intentionally shrouded in secrecy. Their corporate media arm is quick to discredit any information exposing this private central banking cartel as "conspiracy theory". Yet the facts remain. The Federal Reserve Bank was born in 1913, the same year US banking scion J. Pierpont Morgan died and the Rockefeller Foundation was formed. The House of Morgan presided over American finance from the corner of Wall Street and Broad, acting as quasi-US central bank since 1838, when George Peabody founded it in London.

Peabody was a business associate of the Rothschilds. In 1952 Fed researcher Eustace Mullins put forth the supposition that the Morgans were nothing more than Rothschild agents. Mullins wrote that the Rothschilds, "...preferred to operate anonymously in the US behind the facade of J.P. Morgan & Company". John D. Rockefeller used his oil wealth to acquire Equitable Trust, which had gobbled up several large banks and corporations by the 1920's. The Great Depression helped consolidate Rockefeller's power. His Chase Bank merged with Kuhn Loeb's Manhattan Bank to form Chase Manhattan, cementing a long-time family relationship. The Kuhn-Loeb's had financed -- along with Rothschilds -- Rockefeller's quest to become king of the oil patch. National City Bank of Cleveland provided John D. with the money needed to embark upon his monopolization of the US oil industry. The bank was identified in Congressional hearings as being one of three Rothschild-owned banks in the US during the 1870's, when Rockefeller first incorporated as Standard Oil of Ohio.

One Rockefeller Standard Oil partner was Edward Harkness, whose family came to control Chemical Bank. In the insurance business, the Rockefellers control Metropolitan Life, Equitable Life, Prudential and New York Life. Rockefeller banks control 25% of all assets of the 50 largest US commercial banks and 30% of all assets of the 50 largest insurance companies. [19] Insurance companies- the first in the US was launched by Freemasons through their Woodman's of America- play a key role in the Bermuda drug money shuffle.

Companies under Rockefeller control include Exxon Mobil, Chevron Texaco, BP Amoco, Marathon Oil, Freeport McMoran, Quaker Oats, ASARCO, United, Delta, Northwest, ITT, International Harvester, Xerox, Boeing, Westinghouse, Hewlett-Packard, Honeywell, International Paper, Pfizer, Motorola, Monsanto, Union Carbide and General Foods. Know The Truth TV KnowTheTruthTV

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Occupy
• Wall
• Street
• Protest
• #OccupyWallStreet
• banned
• college
• lecture
• speech
• teacher
• classroom
• test
• american
• history
• interview
• education
• exam
• false
• failed
• Rockefeller
• Rothschild
• ww1
• ww2
• hitler
• bush
• treason
• patriot
• heros
• hidden
• lies
• 2012
• federal
• reserve
• islamic
• knowthetruthtv
• elementary
• bible
• lesson
• jesus
• Zionists
• libya
• skull
• bones
• bilderberg
• infowars
• exposed
• Israel
• revolution
• 911
• truth
• marines
• army
• navy
• Illuminatist
• Islam
• christian
• economic
• government
• christianity
• documentary
• educational

[LEFTYM0M65]

OMG! That was intense.

[PurePower025]

@MightyZarkon

lies



[MightyZarkon]

@PaladinHero I'll tell you the secret. Abraham and the Isrealites of the Bible and the real history of Egypt are two different things. Abraham is actually a Hyksos King, a Semite that spoke Aramaic. His peoples invaded Egypt in 1800BC no earlier. This means all of the Genesis and Flood Stories Moses wrote were actually copied from Earlier Egyptian stories. The Hyksos and the Kushites tried to takeover Egypt together.

[Allhardwoodfloor]

Well when you have so so many scholars like zach sitchin and micheal tsarion, g edward griffen, the list is just on and on You should obviously come to the conclusion Some thing needs to change Keep up all the good work Jim Mars

[PaladinHero]

@BlackYahshua Yeah, I was trying to trace his "secret knowledge" bit to its source in his lecture and all he does is assert that b/c Abraham came from the ancient Sumerian culture, he had secret knowledge. Based on what? According to whom? And since when was Abraham a) confirmed archeologically as a real historical figure, and b) wound up in Egypt as some highly influential figure? The WHOLE thing hinges on this assumption and it's, honestly, kinda dumb.

[PaladinHero]

@gloom2 Actually, I see the step I missed: It wasn't the Knights Templar who inspired the Crusades; it was the Cathar families who knew of the portion of Solomon's teasure/knowledge in France and of the remaining treasure of Solomon lied buried under Jerusalem and so THEY made the effort to instigate the Crusades, thus forming the Templars to lead them. I must've zoned out.

[PaladinHero]

@gloom2 Gotcha. I guess I missed that part. I'm rewatching it now to see what I missed. Thanks for the clarification!

[PaladinHero]

@PaladinHero *by "their" I mean their Crusader ancestors, since you're basically saying that the Swiss trace their line back to the Templars. That's like descendants of Holocaust survivors working security at Neo Nazi meetings. Makes no sense.

[PaladinHero]

@gloom2 Why would the Swiss Guard protect the Vatican if it was the Church (under a French king's order, no less) that carried out their expulsion and eradication?

[PaladinHero]

@gloom2 They teach a much more accurate, verifiable truth in Science and History classes than they do in Bible and Creation Science classes. I should know, I went to Christian high schools and they taught bullshit. The Bible is not factual or historical enough to be relied upon for damn near anything. It's a laughable book of contradictory folk tales and to use it as a serious source or reference point on a historical topic undermines any credibility one may garner up to that point.