Hurricane Sandy's Double Whammy

Greenland surface melt 2012 summer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0IjvLa...
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/...


Kangerlussuaq River in Greenland summer 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7SuJ1s...


Scott Mandia on Hurricane Sandy
http://climatecrocks.com/2012/11/02/c...


Science Friday Video: Sandy's CT Scan
http://www.sciencefriday.com/video/11...

NPR Fresh Air on Hurricane Sandy with Radley Horton
http://www.npr.org/templates/rundowns...

• Category

  Science & Technology

[Dosbat1]

Another great video, thanks.

From the data I've been looking at and the papers I've been reading I think a major factor in Global Weirding is the joint issue of Arctic Amplification and Sea Ice loss. I'm still not 100% convinced by the Hurricane Sandy issue, but what Jeff Masters is saying in the video is totally on the ball.

[greenman3610]

will be updating on jet stream soon

[TeslaBlueRepublic]

Who owns the SATELLITES controls the DATA.

EVERY ANALYSIS of THAT 'DATA' is HEAR-SAY.

If YOU haven't kept a thermometer log. START NOW.

Reported temperatures for Rockey Mountain National Park jumped 5-6* F fifteen years ago. Suddenly. Turns out they 'moved' their Monitoring Station, for 'economic reasons', to DIA. That's a hundred miles away and 5,000 feet lower.

Locally observed and RECORDED temperatures at surrounding towns consistently show a MILD DOWNWARD temperature trend.

[greenman3610]

right. and they're hiding all that ice in the arctic to make it look like its going away.

[greenman3610]

the Great Global Warming Swindle? Really? everyone associated with that is disgraced. I took it apart years ago here

watch?v=boj9ccV9htk

And, yes, the National Academy of Science is credible. Especially compared to the random, terribly dated, internet paranoia nonsense that you are citing here.

[Colkitto5]

Thank you for the confirmation. Because loads of AGW cult members claim that physicists are not qualified to speak about climate.

[greenman3610]

there's a lot of physics in the story of radiative forcing, so its part of the deal. a lot of climate experts come from the physics world. what you are looking for are people from diverse backgrounds, but who have been focusing and publishing on climate for significant spans of time. It's complex, it's hard, and its subtle.

[Colkitto5]

Peter are physicists qualified to speak about Global Warming? I thought only climatologists were qualified?

[Y2KCIA]

AGW believers easily dismiss opposing facts through the art of discrediting, labeling, and mocking.

I love the part where the WDC says: "...and know without doubt that this proven "astronomical" climate forcing mechanism cannot be responsible for the warming over the last 100 years."

It's nice that the content of the video I posted is not even addressed. It's easy for people to just ignore science and write things off as "not credible" if it clashes with their pre-determined worldview.

[Y2KCIA]

Who determines "credibility"? You? lol!

It's good to know that you're into citations, when you haven't provided any, and I provided a citation above.

No other AGW hysteric has provided citations on this channel. I find that humorous.

Also, the AGW scientists have been found out to be manipulating data and obscuring results. Not very compelling to the independent-minded.

watch?v=bpEwNpd2_qM

watch?v=YtevF4B4RtQ

watch?v=4QxMdBQABvc