Greenhouse numbers.mov

Does Man-made CO2 really cause Global Warming: just running the numbers

Calculates and presents the effect of the different Man-made and Natural agents generating the 33⁰C of the Greenhouse Effect shown in ⁰ centigrade, taking the impact of atmospheric water vapour as the major Greenhouse Gas fully into account.

It then examines the impact of partially or fully closing down the carbon economies of the major nations expressed in millionths of a ⁰C.

This may be the information that the alarmists, the IPCC and many politicians don't want you to know.

• Category

  Science & Technology

[thonbrocket]

I stopped reading when I realised I was dealing with somebody who couldn't spell "gases"

[ghgemh]

have a look ay Merriam-Webster for gasses

read the rest and you could learn more

[TheClunkingFist]

Except that scientists have only ever observed a negative feedback loop in the real world, which may explain why the planet has exited many ice ages without suffering runaway warming and an end to all life.

[Lennert Veerman]

What this video misses (among others) is that a rise in CO2 causes the water vapour to rise in a positive feedback loop. Also in other ways, this is an extremely naive video. You totally ignore CO2 cycles between air, ocean, and biomass. It doesn't all stay in the air. Better stick with the science.

[Lennert Veerman]

Another denialist video to miseducate the gullible.

[nn123654]

{{citationneeded}}

[Mandoflash]

Amateurs like the IPCC?

[MultiKdizzle]

Better yet reach for your glasses. Or would you call them 'glases'?

[sTevefor3]

Oh, and one other thing: you should probably read what Bjorn Lomborg has said recently. For those who do not know, Lomborg has changed his perspective on AGW. "In a new book argues that global warming is “a challenge humanity must confront" and “undoubtedly one of the chief concerns facing the world today". Oh, I just loves it when deniers have to eat their words. How's it tasting, ghgemh? Kinda nasty, like J. Inhofe just pooped in your salad, eh?