Government Should Stay Out Of The Wombs Of The Nation

FREEDOM BUNKER TV: http://freedombunker.com

Obama calls for a common ground on abortion. There is no common ground. What he CAN do is to step out of the debate. Government does not belong in the discussion AT ALL. Government has no say in the abortion debate. Not one taxpayer dollar should go to pro-life OR pro-choice organizations.

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER: http://twitter.com/bunkerblast

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• obama
• abortion
• notre
• dame
• speech

[JMBSM61]

I have thought long and hard on this subject. I used to say I was pro choice but personally believed abortion was wrong. I have changed my view over the years. The conclusion that I have come to is that I cannot be wishy washy on this. I have to come down on one side or the other. I have made my decision on this. I believe life begins at conception and to kill a fetus is to kill a child. Everyone has to make their own decision on this. It is a hard subject to tackle.

[THINKfutureShow]

The question is: Whose decision is it to make? If the child is a person, then all abortion is murder and should be outlawed. Do you agree with this? If so, then are we not violating the rights of the mother? How can this be enforced without violating the rights of the mother?

[JMBSM61]

Yes. I agree with that statement and would point out that the rights of the victim here ( the unborn child ) have been violated. We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal and are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights among which are LIFE, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I struggled with this subject a long time. Each person must make their own decision on this as based upon their own conscience. I don't propose to force my ideas on anyone.

[THINKfutureShow]

So the question is: how can we stop the mother from aborting the child without blocking her rights? Are you saying that the mothers rights are less important that the rights of the child? If they are equally important, then the only solution is to completely respect and support the mother to take the child to term. How can we do that? We have to delve into the reasons a mother would abort a child and work to remove those.

[AJSensei]

A fetus is life. If I can get a double murder for killing a pregnant woman then it is illigal to have an abortion.

[JHancock1776]

Just curious...how can you equate "neo-fascism" to limited govt. intervention? Those two ideals are seemingly diametrically opposed.

[rednxrule]

future put out the simple solution. but, the feds gotta avert from logic to keep control of any money and decision a citizen wants to make. logic is no longer a factor in government at the fed level. also, they are all progressives (racists) on the hill, and would exteminate millions if they could get away with it. only difference between obama and hitler is gender. hitler had balls at least, ol' bamy is a pussy, or more to the point a cunt.

[JMBSM61]

Well, You bring up many interesting questions. My first answer would be to promote adoption as the best option for all involved and to spend no money promoting abortion and if taxpayer money is to be spent it should be spent promoting adoption. Being an adopted at birth child myself I guess I have a real reason to be thankful that my birth mother chose that option although I have never met her nor do I know anything about her but I do thank her for her decision. Cont.

[THINKfutureShow]

And that is exactly how we can eradicate it...

[JMBSM61]

Bravo!

[jxwhit8]

In short... there is no "passion" behind abortion when people need to start spending their own money. It is easy to get behind eugenics when it is somebody else's money you are spending.

[jxwhit8]

The procedure will be rare, so the cost of it will go up. The insurance companies do not and will not cover the procedure, because it is an elected procedure (unless mom is going to die). When it becomes a pocket book strain... people will become much more careful about protecting themselves before a pregnancy happen. One could argue... what about the poor and their "right" for abortion. I would argue... what right? its a medical procedure.

[jxwhit8]

and it will come from pro-abortionist donation (which is different than pro-choice $... most of whom dont support abortion, but support a woman to have the option). This isnt against pro-choice people... the choice is still there. The pro-life message and money will overwhelm the ability of the pro-abortionist message to make abortion a "good or moral" choice outside of extreme circumstances (life of mom, rape, incest). Without government interference... I believe morality wins... more..