Congressman Roscoe Bartlett on Peak Oil [Part 7]

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,143
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 28, 2008

(April 4th, 2008) Congressman Roscoe Bartlett [R-MD] takes the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives to speak about Energy.

Congressman Roscoe Bartlett on Peak Oil [Part 1]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lwkyqFB-34
Congressman Roscoe Bartlett on Peak Oil [Part 2]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=506-2_zxYns
Congressman Roscoe Bartlett on Peak Oil [Part 3]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YyliwrgbLvo
Congressman Roscoe Bartlett on Peak Oil [Part 4]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwEZqOek0KQ
Congressman Roscoe Bartlett on Peak Oil [Part 5]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNYNuGlDXLo
Congressman Roscoe Bartlett on Peak Oil [Part 6]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=llQIfZXt_88
Congressman Roscoe Bartlett on Peak Oil [Part 7]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvAdLvaCx70

TRANSCRIPT
http://www.c-spanarchives.org/congress/?q=node/77531&id=8519674

Not exactly Jeffersonian, is he? Keep in mind Ron Paul's tip: price of gold and price of oil, parallel lines, fiat-money and price of oil, a roller coaster (fasten your paper-belts).

HIGHLIGHTS

- Ratio of energy available and growth in population... an imbalance between supply and demand [and a debased currency].

- Peak of oil production and compound interest. The U.S. has 2% of the known reserves of oil in the world and uses a fourth [25%] of the world's oil. China is buying up oil reserves wherever they can find them.

- The Hirsch Report by SAIC: The world has never faced a problem like this [Psycho screeching violins].

- Alternatives. Nuclear. Solar and wind energy. Wood. Conventional hydro. Alcohol fuel. The hydrogen economy and the corn ethanol bubble. Geothermal. The tar sands in Canada. The tides. Oil shales. Coal. Breeder reactors. Nuclear fusion. Biomass.

- The Drive Act [will make things worse]. Can't get no satisfaction.

SIDE NOTE: $42 a gallon

"Last year alone, the American forces in Iraq burned through more than 1.1 billion gallons of fuel... A study produced by the U.S. Military Academy estimated that delivering one gallon of fuel to U.S. soldiers in Iraq cost American taxpayers $42 -- and that doesn't include the costs of the fuel itself... the U.S. is spending $923 million per week on fuel-related logistics in Iraq."
http://www.wealthdaily.com/articles/oil-iraq-war/1208

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (jaralero)

  • I think this page really explains the problem we're facing. A speech by a congressman on a subject that may be the most important subject ever, and all I see here are 3 responds.

    Congressman Bartlett did mention in 'A Crude awakening' than not one in a hundred americans really know what we're facing.

  • Yes, Nemesis is catching up with Americans addicted to oil and credit, this channel has no importance so lack of comments here doesn't mean anything, what saddens me is the lack of debate in the U.S. Congress. It's a bleak assembly where elected officials read long speeches before empty seats. M. Simmons, an energy adviser to the Bush administration, believed -in 2005- that oil was too cheap and should be about $182 a barrel!!! Jefferson was right, banks are more dangerous than standing armies.

Top Comments

  • poor guy, he should be president.

  • Roscoe Bartlett did an excelent job here. I would love to have those sheets in ppt.

see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Watching this man i know what Noah must have been like and done, except now it's the judgement by fire. May Jesus bless you Roscoe :)

  • Scary that less than 2000 people have watched this video :(

  • i think that as long as there are as many scientists with as many resources working on it, meaning that research doesnt get interrupted by big wars or depressions, nuclear fusion will be there in maybe 30-40 years. i mean, the first reactors going online. then a few more decades until it provides most electricity.

    the gap is the problem. nuclear fusion is making progress, but its still decades. now we mastered superconducting coils, the LHC proves it, but a few other problems remain.

  • Neither fission, fusion, wind turbines or solar energy is immediately useful for vehicles or a direct replacement for oil. There's an enormous amount of work to do before electrical energy can be a drop-in replacement for personal transport.

    Rail can be electrified easily and so can mining. Very large container ships can run directly with a small nuclear reactor(as many ice breakers, sub marines and naval ships already do).

    The rest is really hard.

  • continued

    ...Fusion will probably surpass fission in economics at some point, but I doubt it will be this century or the next.

  • "Somebody is making a big bet that nuclear fusion will come through, because nothing else is going to be enough to fuel transportation after fossil fuel use declines significantly."

    Your average crust contains 3 ppm uranium and 10 ppm thorium. That's the equivalent of over 100 barrels per tonne of the Earth's crust. We've have several centuries worth of U-238 already mined. There are many thousands to several billions of years worth of fission fuel left depending on what ore grade is acceptable

  • Well, a lot of rubber still comes from the rubber tree, though it's true that the most used plastic is polyethylene (polyester textiles, drink bottles, ...) made from ethylene (needed for synthetic rubbers & produced in the petrochemical industry). Surprise!, world's largest ethylene complex is located in Iran. Bio-derived polyethylene (sugar cane) and Bioplastics seem to be in their infancy. 'Don't know about raw materials, but the silver bullet for energy has to be the sea: tides and seaweed.

  • How about the politicians in D.C. start using bicycle showing us the example? How about more space on the road for bicycles, restrictions for cars in shopping area of the town?

    That'll help reduce the use of gas but I don't see that happening. In fact, I'm seeing the opposite. They keep building new roads more lanes for the cars and less space for the bicycles, at some area, no bike lane at all.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more