The Origin of Religion - part 2

This brilliant series was one of the most important eye-openers for me.

It provides a clear explanation on the origin of the different religions of the world by looking at the origin of the religious symbols they use. All the symbols used by these religions are also incorporated in and of great importance to the Roman Catholic Church ánd Freemasonry (multinational corporations).

It's all about origin, history, truth. This universe came into existence in one way. So there is only one truth. And a lot of intended perversions of it. To find truth is to look at the origin. There one can find the true meaning of these symbols and in that the reason why they are still obsessively used today.

Faith in Jesus Christ is not a religion. It's truth. The RC Church has perverted the truth by pretending to be Christian. But as this video shows, it is not.


This video was made by xjohn.com.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• religion
• faith
• buddha
• buddhism
• hinduism
• chakra
• god
• jesus
• christ
• religious
• believe
• truth
• origin
• nwo
• satan
• devil
• 666
• demon
• demons
• gin
• spirit
• spiritual
• enlightenment
• freemasonry
• freemason
• freemasons
• 9/11
• conspiracy
• theory
• evolution
• darwin
• lie
• synagogue
• jew
• jews
• judaism
• hebrew
• israel
• israelites
• moslim
• moslem
• quran
• qur'an
• life
• death
• sin
• salvation
• saviour

[Stormspeace]

The claim made at 3:50 is false. Quetzalcoatl was NEVER a white bearded man/god to the Mayans. The god was a flying feathered serpent, similar to the dragons in chinese rituals.

The concept of quetzalcoatl as a man was invented and perpetuated by Spanish missionaries in the 17th and 18th centuries in effort to convert the native americans to Christianity. The statue pictured is likely an ancient Mayan king that the Spaniards decided to craft into their quetzalcoatl/Jesus stories.

[EdjeBos]

@Stormspeace You say 'likely'. Are you sure? What is your source? Could't they both be? But even so, I hope this vid shows you that the depicted Jesus is not the real One. The most stunning aspect of the depictions are the intentional female attributes. An angel is neither male nor female and is therefore depicted as both. Doesn't matter. If anything, I hope you see this. It's essential.

[infonator1]

this guy is kn the know! seriously

[EdjeBos]

@infonator1 Yes, he is. I read your comments on the Passion o/t Christ-vid. You claim Jesus is satan. I agree that the R.C.-version ís indeed a depiction of satan. But the historical Jesus. the Jesus of the N.T. is GOD. The Creator. Yes, satan is the deceiver. And this guy ís in the know. And he says Jesus ís God. But His name and person has been 'hijacked' by the R.C. church. One of the smartest things satan ever did. He could not stop christianity from spreading. So he perverted it. Truth!

[1allstarman]

mm your interpretation of 1 corinthians 11:14 is incorrect,or the verse has been inserted by the council of nicea as disinformation. one of the most holy sects were the nazarenes ,to which ,john the baptist's parents dedicated him as a child ! HE NEVER CUT HIS HAIR OR SHAVED HIS BEARD ! what did jesus say about him?... " not a greater man existed, than john the baptist " This is the problem with building doctrine from one isolated verse in the bible ! all else you have said so far is right

[EdjeBos]

@1allstarman Just because John did it, doesn't mean Jesus did it also. What's your proof for the claim the verse was inserted? Btw, sorry for the late reaction. Been busy..  :)

[ganondorf59]

@EdjeBos Once again, idiot, depictions of Jesus are ARTISTIC CREATIVITY! NO artist of a depiction of Jesus claims it to be a live portrait! What a fool! May I remind you, 200 years ago, and still today, IN MANY CHURCHES, Jesus depicted with SHORT HAIR! It's called ARTISTIC LICENCE! You really need to start living in this world instead of believing in insane and groundless conspiracies and demons. R.C. has been BY FAR the most beneficient religion in history. Ignorant imbecile!

[1allstarman]

@EdjeBos I believe angels are aways depicted as male in the bible. at least they all have males names .

[1allstarman]

@EdjeBos there is very little proof for any of this, The phrase is a lie ! as it says "" Does not nature it self teach you if a man wears long hair it is degrading to him ?" First it would be natural to wear long hair. short hair is a social standard, a tradition of men . YHVH told the isrealites, through Moses , not to cut the corners of their hair .other verses that seem to deny that hair cutting is holy.. jer 25:23,49:32,lev 19:27 the verse just goes against all biblical doctrine . !

[gordonculp]

@Frizzurd what predates christianity. please i dont see any similarities,

[gordonculp]

@Frizzurd so false. and i can refute any claim you have. test me