AA77 Fuselage Found at Pentagon Firestation

Font and Timeline; the "C" is not an AA 757 C and the fuselage piece was not there before the afternoon.

911 was an inside crime.

The only thing real on 911 was TV fakery. Everything else we were shown on TV was false.

Thanks and a tip of our hat to Joe Craine, YouTube martyr.

11 161 175 2001 7 9 9-11 9/11 911 93 aa aa11 aa77 abc air airline airlines alan american attack attacks bbc blast building bush C cbs cd center charges cheney chung church cintron clouds cnn commission connie controled controlled courchesne craine damage debris demolition dew disney edna engine evan express fairbanks fake fakes fakery fema financial fire fires firefighting foam fox fuselage gear george ghost ghwb giuliani ground gwb herbert hero heroes heros image inside interpretation jennings job joe judy ktla landing lawn lines martyr murder murray nbc nist no one parts pentagon peter plane planes plant psyop rector report rescue rescuer rescuers rotor rubble rules rummy rumsfeld shaped september september 11 seven shanksville smoke sylverstein tire today trade tube tv two ua ua175 ua93 united walker wallace weather west wfc woods world wtc wtc1 wtc2 wtc7 you youtube zero

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• conspiracy
• attack
• wtc
• wtc2
• south
• attacks
• nose-out
• snopes
• UA
• evidence
• George
• Weld
• NIST
• FOIA
• smoke
• FOX
• Fire
• George Weld
• font
• disney
• warner
• brothers
• characters
• caricature
• satan
• devil
• 132-3261_IMG
• corel
• wordperfect
• joke
• help
• wpd
• word
• cryptome
• air plane
• airplane
• 911
• AA
• 77
• 11
• 175
• 93
• parts
• 77=11
• 767
• 776
• 7/7/6
• 1776
• 1776=9111
• 767=191
• AA=11
• July 7 2006=776=911
• 7/4/1776
• 741776=191119
• 7/6/11
• 7611=1191
• 7/4/11
• 7411=1911

[nameofthepen]

Is it my imagination that when the "C" shows up, the glass panes in several of the windows of that little "flight tower" disappear?

[CNN911Fakes]

nameofthepen

Nice catch. I thinnk you are right. No windows were broken in the official story (that I remember)!

Those are definitely covered.

[Coachrob36]

I also have questioned the "c" plane part....where is the rest of the plane? the bodies? luggage?...makes no sense..

[coorvahmuch]

hmm good quwstion, from "m" or "n", too small on "c", and too thin, letters on aircraft more lightly are made bold from it, compare the size of the letter to the window size of the aircraft and to Ford beside

[chasing91a]

i think it was the letter "S"....you know?....from a "missle".........missles always has letters on them

[jagg1951]

Do ya think twisted wreckage might make a font look different. But that peice of metal sure got moved around a lot unless of course it was just photoshopped into various photos and those doing it bdid not realize where the other photoshopper had placed it.

[TheOnlyTominator]

So, someone moved the part there at some point during the day. All that means is that the it did not land their initially, it's not proof that it was "planted" at the scene.

And the fonts do look the same to me.

(Also, for future reference, showing the same image twice does not constitute a new piece of evidence, one yellow circle with a pan and zoom is enough to establish you point.)

[pixiniarts]

So lemmy get this straight, a government or inside agency plans the biggest terrorist attack on US soil... and when planting the evidence they put the wrong font on the debris?

Try swinging your investigative instincts onto these little enigmas:

Who was the former FBI expert on Bin Laden and what job did he start on that day?

[snoopyd80]

CNNFakes...

These pictures are obviously from different times of the day. The firefighters and clean up units moved the debris to the side for examination of the evidence. Objects of evidence don't really do anybody any good stuck in the side of a building, do they now?

[McHrozni]

Somebody needs to figure out that when you shoot an image of a curved surface, the features will be distorted.

This was such an elementary mistake I had to watch twice to be sure what you're even trying to tell us.

As for the second part, again, it's very hard to figure out what you're trying to say, but you're making an obvious implication that no-one could've moved that part of aluminum because it was in the way of the rescue efforts. Quite preposterus, obviously, and it shows nothing.