shirley sherrod reveals her past racism (with commentary after seeing whole uncut video)
Top Comments
All Comments (4,778)
-
She said it's deeper than a racial issue and was rather a class issue. It's no different than a former Klansmen recanting his racist past in a spirited tone, only for the sake of telling his story before an audience and showing them a glimpse of his past thought process. It's not like she was cheering on racism against Whites. LORD knows I LOVE America, but America has a racist past in which she grew up in. We hate political correctness but when she calls a spade a spade she get's fired. C'mon!
-
@DownloadDoctor1 - There is no evidence the judge wanted to throw it out, he denied Breitbart's motion to throw it out already.
"She deserves nothing"
I don't know if she'll get anything now that Breitbart died on her but the lawsuit is rightful because Breitbart intentionally omitted key parts to make her look a certain way. He tried to make it look like she never helped the white farmers and never learned a lesson. THAT is why he was being sued because that's defamatory.
-
@A86 She is going to lose the lawsuit, the judge would have already thrown it out had the he been allowed to used the anti-SLAPP law enacted a month after the case had started. She deserves nothing and that's exactly what she'll get. Again, for the last time, you can't take racism out of context. She admitted to being racist in the past and learning from it to no longer be racist. There's nothing in the full video that goes against either of those, case closed.
-
@DownloadDoctor1 - Referring to her lawsuit against the now-dead Andrew Breitbart. Dimbart intentionally took her out of context by omitting the key part I just mentioned to make it seem like she remained a racist and never helped those white farmers (who later publicly defended her). That omission damaged her reputability by making it look like she refues to help white persons in need, hence why the judge didn't dismiss her lawsuit as frivolus and ignored Breitbart's motion to dismiss it.
-
@DownloadDoctor1 - Uh, no shit she was originally a racist. No one's denying that. What the right-wing is trying to do here is take out the part where she had a change of heart. She WAS (key word: was) originally a racist but had a change of heart and put her past behind her when she saw the white lawyer did not do right by those white farmers. She intervened and helped them when other white people failed them.
Ignoring that part won't help. That's why the judge didn't dismiss her lawsuit.
-
What a fucking racist, that ugly bitch is.
-
@igoodnessi311 because it is edited?
-
@A86 She was a racist, there's no way to take that out of context. smh Would she have been any less racist BACK THEN if he uploaded the entire video, hell no. If you can't follow that, that's your own problem.
-
@DownloadDoctor1 - Nothing taken out of context? Breitbart deliberately cut off the part where she said she put her past behind her and grew as a person. The white farming family she helped even defended her.
@Dipstikk
That's such bull white politicians get kicked out of office for the slightest "racial offenses." No a white politician would get ran out of the country for this, and how is it being grotesquely racist that I'm pissed that someone like her gets a pass so saying something like this? It's bullshit.
Slecker95 8 months ago 5
How is an unedited clip of a woman speaking propaganda? The woman admitted to racial discrimination against a dude a long time ago and then said she grew from that; he included the part about her changing her racist practices in the original video. HOW IS THIS PROPAGANDA? It is evidence that showed NAACP members applauding racial discrimination against a white guy; that was the point. NAACP is a racist organization by its very title. Let's advance people not white people or colored people.
igoodnessi311 1 year ago 4