Cornered: The New Monopoly Capitalism And The Economics of Destruction pt.1

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,010
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 18, 2010

http://MOXNews.com/
April 17, 2010 C-SPAN

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • Concentrated power, capital, control is in direct contradiction to actual American Liberty. It is the big corporation, the international corporation that threatens this concentration again. Barry Lynn benefits us greatly by helping us remember the dangers of big corporate concentration. Kudos.

  • @whoo689 His speech seemed very historically accurate to me..What facts do you dispute?The founding fathers WERE very anti-corporation any logical historian would agree with that...Do you disagree?

see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So we see, p256, that by the mid 1940s that future opinion would favour "free trade, an international bank, an international police force, and a world court." At that time the opinion leaders had set in train a public opinion to favour the formation of the United Nations which took place in 1945. This event would naturally lead to opinions in favour of multiculturalism, world government and a New World Order without any one person in a million knowing what this was all about.

  • @KamikazeKoscki What is the difference between a payment and a bribe? At what point does persuasion become corruption?

    You will note that with this technique the target group is not approached directly. There will always be one or more "innocent" carriers between the corrupting influence and the victim.

  • @KamikazeKoscki So it is that fashions, trends, movements, political imperatives, pop-singers and popular beliefs are manipulated and imprinted on the mass mind. It is not explained just how the fashion designers were induced to use velvet in the example given; no doubt it was made "worth their while".

  • @KamikazeKoscki Bernays tells of how markets were regained for a group of textile manufacturers. Velvet had gone out of fashion and its manufacturers in the USA were facing ruin. Study showed that the market could not be revived by action taken within America so where was the vital spot? Quote:

  • @KamikazeKoscki public, the American buyer or the American woman of fashion was simply shown the velvet creations in the atelier of the dressmaker or the milliner. ...

    The editors of the American magazines and fashion reporters of the American newspapers, likewise were subjected to the actual (although created) circumstance ... A demand was slowly, but deliberately, created in Paris and America.

  • It was determined to substitute purpose for chance and to utilize the regular sources for fashion distribution ...

    An intelligent Parisian was enlisted in the work. He visited Lanvin and Worth, Agnes and Patou, and others and induced them to use velvet in their gowns and hats. It was he who arranged for the distinguished Countess This or Duchess That to wear the hat or the gown. And as for the presentation of the idea to the

  • It was a rebellion against unfair taxxes and bailouts. LIke the bailout tax they made for that tea company.

  • What was censored at 5:08?

  • It's not often you get to hear this much truth on the MSM.....Still it's sadening to see so few people in the audience.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more