R Dawkins " You can not disprove the existence of God"

Dawkins chain of argument is only as strong as its weakest link. Since he knows (I credit him with this much) rationally and empirically you CAN NOT disprove God's existence: His whole edifice is built on sand. It will be exposed as FOOLISHNESS in the next 20 years or so! History will smile and the first major atheistic delusion of the 21st century. The Bible says "The Fool says in his heart: There is no God" Is Dawkins an academic fool (Even if he is making a lot of money spreading his simple faith based on ignorance)? You decide!

Category:

Education

Tags:

• atheism
• evolution
• science
• design
• dawkins
• genesis
• Jesus
• life
• thinking
• testimony
• philosphy
• evidence
• cosmology
• geology

[EdiNachman]

That would be a really interesting domentary to see. Evolution is neither here nor there when it comes down to Yahuah's being. If he wanted to Yahuah could choose to allow creatures to develop gradually, as in the case of mircoevolution. All Dawkins people can do is try to explain what they see through experimentation and theorising. Since none of them were there back at the beginning they can only believe like the rest of us. But thanks be To Yahuah he has given prophets to explain!!! Light BE!

[EnricoFantini]

Why don't you record this Yahuah character's voice and upload it here one day. If you can't, it really comes down to being voices in your head and nothing else. And if he's talking to you and have answer for everything, why don't you share something with us that no one else would know of, for example something that's gonna happen tomorrow or something that is taking place far from you without your knowledge.

[EdiNachman]

You think reality is totally based on your sense of hearing. No my friend there is a lot more to reality than the sense of hearing. Yahuah has spoken to other people and independently confirmed what he spoke to me. This means he was also a voice outside of mt head. What more my experience is nothing compared to the prophet he is and has spoken to. I am a novice and hearing and obeying his voice. By my experience alone is enough to demonstrate that athiest is for some deliberate blindness!

[DeimosSaturn]

The onus is not on the person of a neutral position (agnostic atheist) to prove why they do not accept a claim to be true. The onus is SQUARELY on the person presenting the claim. Until evidence and ONLY until evidence is presented to support the claim, the position of a rational person is to remain neutral (to LACK belief). Dawkins has said time and again he does not *BELIEVE* god doesn't exist, he says he *LACKS* belief in a god.

[EdiNachman]

Dawkins is a believer. What ever clever use of words you apply to him, he is a believer. He believe in atheism. Athiest is based on ignorace of god only one who has no relationship with god can be an atheist because as soon as you have been introduced to Yahuah, atheism goes the way of the wind. Every blind man who now sees as a result of faith knows that his blindness fled under a higher power domionion. Every atheist who meets God knows athiesm is folly! Just seek the truth honestly!

[Censeo]

The Bible is biased. It first of all assumes God exist. It would be kind of strange if the Bible had said "Some are wise although they don't believe in God"

You and Dawkins agree on a few things. That we can't know everything and that we technically can't disprove Allah or Nirvana or reincarnation. And you both don't believe in those. You don't need reasons to not believe in things that there is no evidence for, so you don't have to defend yourself for not believing in reincarnation.

[EdiNachman]

What is the Bible? The Bible is not a book of philopshy, it is God's words. It has with it it book after book of Yahuah speaking to his people and to the nations. But he doesn't just speak , he also fulfils. Before Jesus rose from the dead, he said he would be raised from the dea. He then demonstrated his prediction by rising. He then showed himself to 500 eyewitnesses after he rose. This was empirical evidence! The bible is full of empirically testable prophecies! No wonder science came from it

[entyrion]

I will agree with you on this: Richard Dawkins is an evangelist for atheism. I find the evangelical approach itself to be annoying regardless of the philosophy behind it.

However, if I announce that at this very moment a teacup in orbit around Pluto, it would not be unreasonable to doubt my claim.

Technically, you cannot disprove the existence of the teacup since no telescope would be able to see a teacup from that distance and no spacecraft has yet visited the planetoid.

[BratvaTV]

Will you be fair enough to admit that the only evidence you have for the existence of God is that it can not be disproven? It would seem to be the case. Im sure this comments getting trashed, but I find it pretty amazing that the more science discovers things that go against older knowledge, religiousist take the findings as if its proving their case.

[gangstagrannie]

Most people who know God dont feel the need to prove it to anyone. I know I certainly dont feel that need. I just feel priviliged.

[gangstagrannie]

I watched a documentary some time back which disproved evolution.

One of the subjects covered was the fact that granite (yes, granite) was impossible to have evolved and according to scientists, it had to have been created in a very short period of time due to its make up.

I can't go into to detail because I dont remember all the details (at least Im honest lol) but it made so much sense.

Im sure if anyone researched granite they'd see the point here.

[EnricoFantini]

Care to share when, where and how you found him?

[Boldhome]

You seem to have removed my comment and then replied to it. Reinstate it (if that is possible) and I will respond to your reply. All I see here are your comments. If you're sure of your god why cut critiques? If your divine creator of the whole universe is real, I'm sure he can take a little criticism.