JFK Assassination Oswald CBS Mannlicher Carcano Rifle Test 1967

http://www.jfkassassinationforum.com JFK Assassination Oswald CBS Mannlicher Carcano Rifle Test 1967

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• JFK
• Assassination
• Oswald
• CBS
• Mannlicher
• Carcano
• Rifle
• Test
• 1967

[andrelebaron]

@frankmat kennedy's head snapped forward about an inch after the head shot and then backwards eight inches. a bullet has enough force to move something the size of a head about an inch. so LOGICALLY, the shot came from behind and the head snap was his nervous system and LOGICALLY, you don't have enough brain to be washed.

[andrelebaron]

@frankmat the evidence has withstood the test of time unlike all the crazy conspiracy theories that have been shown to be based on lies, distortions and selective facts. And it's E Howard and the "confession" was reported by his drug dealer son who needed money.  Yeah, that's pretty solid stuff.

[RUBENV1960]

The last 2 were almost together I thought. is this right?

[bobzeda]

Please watch LBJ TAPES: Kennedy Assassination. It's the phone call between hoover and LBJ a week after the assassination. 3 bullets: 2 into the president and 1 separate bullet into the governor. Bullets two and three were right after each other per the Connally and Jakie testimony.

[flouride666]

@frankmat all of the evidence points to Oswald. It was his gun that fired the bullets. His gun was found in the window. He left the scene (his job) with no explanation. Shot a cop. Resisted arrest. He tried to assassinate Gen. Walker too, his wife confirmed it. Many people have "confessed" to killing JFK (James Files, Robert Morrow, etc), and obviously they can't all be telling the truth, so no, Hunt's confession does not prove anything at all. Didn't you want to say something about physics?

[frankmat]

@flouride666 Evidence? What evidence that Oswald did it. The evidence has already been shown to be flimsy and planted. In fact you want evidence... what about the death bed confession by Howard E Hunt? Do we no longer take confessions for murder as evidence? Or do you just conveniently ignore what doesn't fit your agenda?

[flouride666]

@frankmat I gave you the exact reason, the exit wound. Again, think about physics. Bullets don't have the force to move his head, it's that simple. What is your specific criticism with the explanation of the exit wound being the reason for JFK's head movement? What do you propose happened? Or do you simply choose to believe it wasn't Oswald, and ignore the evidence?

[frankmat]

@flouride666 So in other words... you have absolutely no idea why his head jerks back.... because there is no LOGICAL reason for it..... so you cannot give me one.

What you are.... is a patriot.... who would never believe your people would kill their own for political reasons. I bet you think muslims did 9/11 as well right?

Patriotism like religion is just another form of brainwashing... and the funny thing is you have absolutely no idea how affected your thinking is.

[flouride666]

@frankmat for the answer, search for "P&T-BS-Conspiracy Theories Part 3/3 (HQ)" and skip to about 7:30. It was the exit wound. However, again, it's simple physics: the force of the bullet could not have caused him to move. So whatever the reason, it wasn't because he was shot from the front.

[frankmat]

@flouride666 Really? So it was just a summer breeze that knocked his head back? Exactly what caused his head to jerk back like that at the exact moment he was shot? You talk about "logic" and then come up with the most ridiculous illogical 'theories'.

So I am waiting... you tell me what caused JFK's head to jerk back like that? Was it a groovy tune coming on the radio at that exact moment?