Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

March 27, 2000

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
16,859
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 10, 2007

John and Patsy Ramsey interviewed on CNN, publicizing their book Death of Innocence. Part one of two (the other part broadcast on March 28th), section one of eight.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (218)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • These poor people have suffered so much. May Jonbenet and Patsy rest in peace. Hopefully justice on earth will be served one day.

  • yeah that completely defeats the purpose of holding someone for ransom, killing them? not only that but if an intruder did break in to murder her then no ransom note would be left... i dont understand why would there be a ransom note if if were dead beside it? there cant be an intruder cause there is no motive. people who want a ransom do not kill the captive instantly, without even kidnapping them, and leave a ransom note. killers dont do that they either go to kill or hold for ransom.

  • If you're innocent you would gladly take a lie detector test! Especially, if you are under suspicion of murdereing your child!

  • They killed her, their body language points to them lying. hands clasped in front of them, tightening of the lips when they lie, and sticking out their tongue. Frozen body language.... and when asked about the lie detector see how long it took them to say that they would agree to it - they are scared to be caught out. They have only got away with this because of the cross contamination of the evidence

  • its strange how unemotionless the mom is. no tears. and the dad hardly looks like a broken man.

  • but go along with your DNA evidence, like the italian mob, as they lynched Amanda Knox, because of it..

    and btw..i dont know but eveytime in this family murder cases...arrives years later some mysterious DNA evidence to support their innocents.....

    like in the "Routier" or "Mcdonald" case.

    im sure, they would be cleard too now, if they wouldnt be sitting in jail at the moment.

    so, whats my issue here? my issue is, that everyone who says that the dna proved that they are not guilty, is a moron.

  • its so fucking ridicolous how dumb people are!!! Just because there is some DNA...that DNA is a partial and to old and degraded. It will never match. Also, i believe that this DNA could be from the Investigators, officers on the Scene.

    And even if there was some intruder, what i dont believe...you obv. cant clear the ramseys either. Doesnt mean they have nothing to do with it.

    You guys here on youtube, are wrong on every subject on this issue.

    @69ingunicorns

    wtf, does that mean?

  • @frickadele I completely agree.

    DNA is like fingers if they don't match they didn't do it.

    

  • @thelaurels13 Yeah or kill, or accidentially kill, and then leave a note. It took time to write. Not flee right away, but then like you said, why write it ahead of time either.

  • John, Patsy & Casey Anthony making money off their dead children & not caring at all. If I lost my child, I don't even think I could be in an interview. Patsy is smiling as she's telling the story.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more