WTC 7 NIST Model Reality Check

http://femr2.ucoz.com/forum/9

This video highlights the very obvious and serious differences between the way that WTC 7 deformed as it descended and the NIST computer models of the same event.

The NIST models are visual the end-product of their computer model, which forms the basis of their conclusions.

Highlighting such serious flaws when comparing the NIST model behaviour to reality is only one small issue with the NIST report, it's methods, and findings.


The NIST Final Report on WTC 7 does not in any way explain the descent.

NIST should be directly challenged on all issues.


NIST have even included a 2.26s period of free-fall during the descent...

The original NIST videos:
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/re...

• Category

  Science & Technology

[Algonquien]

The 2 LSDYNA models weren't composites of the collapse. They were only programmed with values needed to aid NIST in predicting whether or not debris damage to south face was relevant to mode of global collapse...only structural elements were quantified - they didn't include effect of facade / invariables etc.

The moment frame seen in the simulations was concealed 2 ft behind a granite wall curtain so how / if the skeleton distorted could not be determined by viewing the WTC7 footage anyways

[femr2]

They have two thirds of the core columns and almost all of the external core columns intact during the period of time in which near freefall acceleration of the roofline descent occurred.

It's a cartoon. Period.

[zenoist2]

Explain away all you like you idiotic debunkers.

The video clearly does not match reality.

And thats what they based their report on!

Its totally laughable.

PS the NIST report on wtc 7 has stage 2 of the collapse occuring at free fall speed,when certain idiots have denied free fall speed all along ,look it up.

[roquefortfiles]

I wish all of you truther nuts would just give up on this nonsense of B 7. This is SUCH a non story. The FDNY knew all about this structures situation. The building was examined by structural engineers and determined to be in serious risk of collapsing.  It was cordoned off and simply allowed to burn unattended. They established a zone around it and waited for it to come down. This is old old news. Look it up.

Give up on the conspiracy nonsense. Its pathetic.

[zenoist2]

Their next video will prove conclusively by computer sim a terrorist on the ground bought down the wtcs by throwing a coconut at them.

Computer sims never lie!

[roquefortfiles]

If you're dumb enough to think terrorists attacked you because they "Hate your freedoms"...

You deserve to be attacked. They attacked you because of your policies in the Middle East. (What YOUR government does around the globe etc)..

Not because you are FREE!!!. If you're dumb enough to swallow the crap George Bush tries to sell the American public on (the only thing they CAN understand) Freedom has NOTHING to do with this.

[roquefortfiles]

The FDNY were fully aware this building was going to collapse. Go and look for something called the 9/11 oral histories dude. Interviews with all of the fire men dealing with the building. Go and read it!!. You will NEVER make the same stupid comments on this again having read it. Not possible.

7 was roped off and allowed to burn because the FDNY had better things to be doing. They established a collapse zone around it and simply waited on it.

Get informed you pin head.

You ain't

[ManAgainstCrime]

Only a moron believes 44 'walked off' 79 triggering the whole building to drop demolition style. If you're so sure 9/11 was the work of 'teworwists' who hate our 'fweedoms' then why come here and your little knickers in a twist? Why not jump off a bridge and rid the world of one more government brown nosing turd. Huh?

[roquefortfiles]

See no evidence, hear no evidence..

Just bullshit theories that get sent back and forth between the collective nuts that you all are.

What evidence??? There is none!!

[ManAgainstCrime]

See no evil, hear no evil, just talk bs.. is that how it is for you? ;o)

[roquefortfiles]

Nope!!

Nothing to see.

Did you want to add something? 

[ManAgainstCrime]

Move along, nothing to see here..huh? ;o)

[EVEplanB]

Did NIST ever release the programming simulation parameters to the public? Because I think some AE911 truth computer geeks in architecture would put their program under scrutiny to see what kind of programming they did for the sim.