Free to do what? Please define freedom for me in terms of how you are using the term. If you believe you are free to do evil, you have a backwards definition of freedom. One cannot be free IF one is trapped by their base selfish evil instincts. The pursuit of happiness is a refference to the philosophers use of the good life=the moral life. So one can only be free if they are free to do good, minus being weighed down by guilt and shame of doing wrong.
Law isnt based on God?? Again are you completely ignorant of the entire history of this nation as well as the laws its based on? You completely ignorant of First Principles of Reason? Theres NO way you can meaningfully deny what Im saying WITHOUT necessarily implying the truth of what Im saying in your very denial. Example: How do you know FOR SURE there is no God when that would require omniscience to be able to claim that?
Hint: The admittance of omniscience my friend is NOT an argument AGAINST the existence of God it just proves there is one, but cant be you because omniscience wouldnt make a self refuting argument like you would.
The fact that you can't seem to discern between a preacher who preaches on the basis of religious text or philosophy and a political commentator is an amazing testiment to your secular education and worldview. Just because a preacher and pollitical commentator both use reason (and dont misuse it like you are) doesnt mean a preacher=a pollitical commentator or news caster.
Wgho is the hypocrite? If you have no objective standard of right that is identical to our unchanging God, then you have no objective basis to judge or measure changing behavior. If you have no objective standard by which to judge behavior then nothing can really be wrong in itself (ie hypocrisy doesnt exist). So you cant say hypocrisy is wrong, let alone discrimination, or "imposing" ones beliefs on another.
Which is it? Is there an objective law=to God which allows you to make moral judgements or is all what you say including your claim that God doesnt exist just your baseless opinion?
If there are some things that ARE really wrong (not right) then how could you judge that without a standard that is identical to the God you claim doesnt exist? Which is it? If there are such a thing as innocent people, that means there must be a standard by which to measure who is close to innocence/without blame of certain charges of evil doing, and whois far from innocent.
"wrongly" convicted? How do you get what is wrong/not RIGHT unless there is a real RIGHT? But if youre saying the behaior goes away from the standard of what is right meaning the standard is different from the behavior being judged in line with the standard, where do you get that standard from? How do you get a real right and real wrong without a moral law? How do you get a moral law without a moral law giver or a prescription without a prescriber?
Wait..are you saying that imposing beliefs is absolutely wrong? If so on what basis do you have to say its really not right without implying there is a real right? You keep CLAIMING and ASSUMING there is no God..how do you KNOW for SURE there is no God. Maybe you can answer my question instead of run from it?
Im ALSO NOT talking about imposing beliefs on people. Im saying this is what this country is about, is based on, so theres no way you can meaningfully or correctly deny that truth and seek to impose your irrational secular beliefs ON what this nation is all about. Truth is actually undeniable and inescapable, so imposing is not required.
Ok so again, are you claiming you know for sure that there is no God?? Im not suggesting a Theocracy (direct rule of God as king) NO ONE is..READ the Declaration of Independence and tell me if you think THAT is reffering to a Secular government run by irrational anti theistic contradictory principles..such as the ones you espouse?
oh yeah. i'm a -total- right wing hack..
i'm a member of the green party, dumb ass.
cookimonstizzle 4 years ago
what facts? you've got no argument.
we're talking about opinions. you can't do research on those. stop arguing for the sake of arguing.
cookimonstizzle 4 years ago
ill put something else in ur mouth unless you actually start researching the facts
69nintendo69 4 years ago
how would you know how it feels?
right wing hack.
lay off the billo
69nintendo69 4 years ago
quit putting words in my fucking mouth.
a thief is breaking the law in multiple ways, and endangers the life of a family.
that's different.
cookimonstizzle 4 years ago
wow you listen to talk radio too much.
PAY ATTENTION TO ANY NEWS SHOW, especially fox news in general.
they claim the left will raise taxes constantly if they're elected.
I know discrimination is wrong because I wouldn't want anyone to feel discriminated against. I know how it feels, and it's wrong.
cookimonstizzle 4 years ago
"everyone has a religion, and everyone is religious"?
wow.
i'm actually an atheist, asshole.
cookimonstizzle 4 years ago
because less time and money have been spent investing in their future.
fucking christ, can you read? i said that in the last reply.
cookimonstizzle 4 years ago
LMFAO
"A PREACHER...USE REASON"!
god damn. you're funny..
cookimonstizzle 4 years ago
evil is an opinion, jackass.
i believe you're evil, and you do not.
= example
cookimonstizzle 4 years ago
are you saying i don't have morality because i don't believe in a god?
that's ridiculous. i can tell right from wrong. unlike some christians, i don't kill people :D
cookimonstizzle 4 years ago
i'm not running, i just have other things to do. lol.
i'm saying your idea of a religious government is wrong because it discriminates against me.
there is no god because there is no proof of god. :)
cookimonstizzle 4 years ago
why do you think they left britain? religious freedom. lol.
cookimonstizzle 4 years ago
One SHOULD NOT be free or permitted to do evil LIKE treat a human as LESS than human as in slavery or abortion.
Dominick7 4 years ago
Free to do what? Please define freedom for me in terms of how you are using the term. If you believe you are free to do evil, you have a backwards definition of freedom. One cannot be free IF one is trapped by their base selfish evil instincts. The pursuit of happiness is a refference to the philosophers use of the good life=the moral life. So one can only be free if they are free to do good, minus being weighed down by guilt and shame of doing wrong.
Dominick7 4 years ago
Law isnt based on God?? Again are you completely ignorant of the entire history of this nation as well as the laws its based on? You completely ignorant of First Principles of Reason? Theres NO way you can meaningfully deny what Im saying WITHOUT necessarily implying the truth of what Im saying in your very denial. Example: How do you know FOR SURE there is no God when that would require omniscience to be able to claim that?
Dominick7 4 years ago
Hint: The admittance of omniscience my friend is NOT an argument AGAINST the existence of God it just proves there is one, but cant be you because omniscience wouldnt make a self refuting argument like you would.
Dominick7 4 years ago
The fact that you can't seem to discern between a preacher who preaches on the basis of religious text or philosophy and a political commentator is an amazing testiment to your secular education and worldview. Just because a preacher and pollitical commentator both use reason (and dont misuse it like you are) doesnt mean a preacher=a pollitical commentator or news caster.
Dominick7 4 years ago
Wgho is the hypocrite? If you have no objective standard of right that is identical to our unchanging God, then you have no objective basis to judge or measure changing behavior. If you have no objective standard by which to judge behavior then nothing can really be wrong in itself (ie hypocrisy doesnt exist). So you cant say hypocrisy is wrong, let alone discrimination, or "imposing" ones beliefs on another.
Dominick7 4 years ago
Which is it? Is there an objective law=to God which allows you to make moral judgements or is all what you say including your claim that God doesnt exist just your baseless opinion?
Dominick7 4 years ago
If there are some things that ARE really wrong (not right) then how could you judge that without a standard that is identical to the God you claim doesnt exist? Which is it? If there are such a thing as innocent people, that means there must be a standard by which to measure who is close to innocence/without blame of certain charges of evil doing, and whois far from innocent.
Dominick7 4 years ago
"wrongly" convicted? How do you get what is wrong/not RIGHT unless there is a real RIGHT? But if youre saying the behaior goes away from the standard of what is right meaning the standard is different from the behavior being judged in line with the standard, where do you get that standard from? How do you get a real right and real wrong without a moral law? How do you get a moral law without a moral law giver or a prescription without a prescriber?
Dominick7 4 years ago
Wait..are you saying that imposing beliefs is absolutely wrong? If so on what basis do you have to say its really not right without implying there is a real right? You keep CLAIMING and ASSUMING there is no God..how do you KNOW for SURE there is no God. Maybe you can answer my question instead of run from it?
Dominick7 4 years ago
Im ALSO NOT talking about imposing beliefs on people. Im saying this is what this country is about, is based on, so theres no way you can meaningfully or correctly deny that truth and seek to impose your irrational secular beliefs ON what this nation is all about. Truth is actually undeniable and inescapable, so imposing is not required.
Dominick7 4 years ago
Ok so again, are you claiming you know for sure that there is no God?? Im not suggesting a Theocracy (direct rule of God as king) NO ONE is..READ the Declaration of Independence and tell me if you think THAT is reffering to a Secular government run by irrational anti theistic contradictory principles..such as the ones you espouse?
Dominick7 4 years ago