Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

"The Constitution is just a piece of paper" - G.W. Bush

Countdown with Keith Olbermann. Olbermann interviews Jonathan Turley a constitutional law expert who rips Bush a new asshole, pointing out how many of his cronies are former criminals who have no r...  
 
Customize

More From: alephomega

Loading...

QuickList(0)

1,284 ratings
Sign in to rate
210,713 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (1,152)   Options

Loading...
jsgoodfella (5 days ago) Show Hide
 -3
Marked as spam
then kill every member of congress who supports medicare
jscott2700 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 -6
Marked as spam
BenjaminWirtz (1 day ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Exactly, charity cannot be mandatory. Volunteer charity (is there really any other kind?) is more efficient than any government program.
jscott2700 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 -5
Marked as spam
Ah, Mr. End Of Discussion, I see you are a supporter of tyranny. Goodie for you. That's exactly what the Constitution was meant to stop.
MeThinksThus (1 week ago) Show Hide
 -6
Marked as spam
arcturus33333 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 -4
Marked as spam
Well, the Declaration of Independence affirms we have the right to "Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. We can't have any of those if we have a life threatening illness but can't afford to see a doctor.  "...members of a society are obligated to serve and protect each other." --Steffie Woolhandler, MD
JRPeyesatsne (1 week ago) Show Hide
 -2
Marked as spam
There are things called positive and negative rights. A negative right means x can't prevent you from doing y. A positive right, like, for example, a "right to have an education" or a "right to healthcare", or even, in finland's case, a "right to high speed internet" means that x has to force w to pay for you doing y.
Don't you think people got sick in 1789? If so, why didn't the founding fathers include healthcare in the constitution?
arcturus33333 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
The Constitution doesn't say that 2 and 2 is four either, but we know it is. A lot of things aren't included in it. They couldn't be expected to think of everything. That doesn't mean that we shouldn't have a national health care system. This is a democracy and the majority wants it. End of discussion.
jsgoodfella (5 days ago) Show Hide
 -3
Marked as spam
then if the majority wishes to end gay marriage you should allow them to do so. also more people strongly oppose the democrat healthcare plan than strongly support. basically your statement is silly as you ignore the tenth amendment
josephdupont (3 weeks ago) Show Hide
+3
Marked as spam
Obama's push to make health insurance mandatory show that he does not respect the constitution.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.