NH: Armed civilians crowd state house "right to record" hear
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (71)
-
That cop in the beginning is giving the impression that people will get the courage to come up to cops to report a crime and don't want to be recorded.
Really, how many times has that ever happened?
If someone's scared, they will call in an anonymous tip, not approach a uniformed officer where they could be seen by the person they are reporting. Seriously, who does that cop think he's fooling?
-
What's the problem? He has the right to protect himself.
-
@bossman12334 Armed citizens... welcome to America. Where are you from Bossman, California? :)
-
@bossman12334 This is the NH State House and this is a right to carry state. those are civilins with weapons in the State House. We got it that way by bouncing the state reps who opposed it...
-
its good law, not bad.
-
The woman (who wants the health care) know less than my 14 year old. She is completely ignorant and uneducated.
The public servant (the nasal toned bitch)... needs to be removed from office. What a complete waste of NH tax dollars.
Liberals are disgusting and intellectually soft.
-
Just HAVING confidential informants is a violation of a defendant's right to discovery, because knowing the source of the state's evidence and it's credibility (or lack of) is just as important to fairness in defense of the accused as viewing the evidence itself. If a confidential informant has a history of making false reports to the cops in exchange for drugs from the evidence locker, and he is the one who gives the report that gets me busted for selling guns, I have the right to know.
-
This is one of the most honest cops in the town of pittsfield! I back him 100%
-
that guy in the beginning that writing on a paper and the guy in the white shirt that talks that are armed are they cops? is this in a court house?
if your IN PUBLIC then there is no "expectation of privacy" period! You want a private conversation then go to a private spot. Transparency is paramount. Public official working IN PUBLIC can and should be held accountable, using a lawful camera in plain sight, while "not interfering" is a way to hold them accountable. The freedom to record what I want in public is my free speech. In Portland Or. city police (now) are told to respect videographer and "we can film the police without being hassled
zebra334 2 years ago 15
On the job - on the record.
EdwardMandellHouse 2 years ago 14