I Know What I Saw- JAL 1628

Excerpt from the UFO documentary by James Fox on the History Channel aired on October 4, 2009. This video covers the JAL 1628 incident, and shows how the US government attempted to hide the evidence.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• UFO
• KNOW
• WHAT
• SAW
• HISTORY
• CHANNEL
• JAMES
• FOX
• CONSPIRACY
• COVER
• UP
• JAL
• 1628
• FAA
• John
• Callahan
• Alaska
• ufos
• alien

[curtfaulk]

First, as you know, aircraft carriers do not fly. However, a formation flight of two or more aircraft can appear to occupy space as large as an aircraft carrier in some light conditions, especially if the flight is in a "radar trail" sort of formation. Some aircraft fly that way as a matter of their mission (normally fighter aircraft with an air-to-ground role, F-15E, F-16s). We can't really see weather fronts on radar. We can see precipitation with certain filters/circuits set correctly.

[nofooIn]

@curtfaulk Thanks for the response. I ask because if an extremely large object was in trail of the 747, as the pilot reported, shouldn't the radar return indicate the size? As far as I can tell, there was nothing out of the ordinary about the radar blip that appeared behind the plane, except that it appeared intermittently.

[curtfaulk]

All I can say for sure is that this crew was definitely shook up, rattled or whatever you want to call it; very professional still, but shook up nonetheless. My guess is that they saw something VERY odd. If I had to guess, I would speculate that it was a military aircraft that was classified in 1986 and remained classified for a few more years but has now been declassified for many years and is very familiar to the public.

[nofooIn]

@curtfaulk Hello again. Since you are an expert, I have a question for you. Do you suppose an object the size of an aircraft carrier or larger would show up as a blip on radar, or would it look more like a weather front?

I wonder what you believe it could be, because nothing we have to my knowledge matches what the pilot reported.

[ZoamChomsky]

The "UFO" delusion depends on generations of believers treating claims as facts. But claims about purportedly extraordinary events aren't even evidence, much less facts. A believer in the FS myth claimed he saw "spaceships," as he had before, but his crew saw only "lights." He alone claimed a "giant mothership" was on his tail but two other aircrews said there was nothing there. So how could just "lights" and darkness be "spaceships" to him? It was merely his FS fantasy. Believing is seeing. ;~)

[nofooIn]

@ZoamChomsky There are other sightings that support the existence of a very large UFO in Alaska skies in the late '80s. Soon after the JAL1628 event, a military plane reported the same UFO as was described by the JAL pilot. In John Alexander's recent book, he wrote of native Alaskan scouts who worked for the military that witnessed a similar large UFO from the ground. This thing was seen more than once.

[MrStig691]

@ZoamChomsky Sorry to burst your bubble, but the Tehran event happened, the pilots saw it...there's no point

[MrStig691]

@ZoamChomsky They were on radar, the pilot's communcations are documented. To call it a myth is dumb.

[MrStig691]

@curtfaulk Military aircraft? Only if it was back-engineered, given the alien-type maneouvers.

[Cartmanland98]

@Cartmanland98 people will actually believe my above comment... lol

[Cartmanland98]

yes.. and I have proof of who killed kennedy but the CIA told me not to talk. But I have papers proving who did it and I saved them from my 1958 dot matrix printer and that's PROOF! So say I'm wrong.. thought so!

[curtfaulk]

I've come back here now, months later, and read some more of these comments. I don't know what this crew saw. But I was working in Anchorage TRACON after we accepted the handoff from Anchorage ARTCC Sector 6 on this aircraft. I heard all of the radio transmissions (I was working a "handoff" position, not a "radar" position, so I was listening, but not doing the talking).