A short video challenging the use of high-stakes standardized tests to judge students and schools. Produced for the non profit organization FairTest. www.fairtest.org
A short video challenging the use of high-stakes standardized tests to judge students and schools. Produced for the non profit organization FairTest. www.fairtest.org
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
This video has been removed from your Favorites. (Undo)
Like to Favorite videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
While I agree that the education system in America has gaping flaws, I think that its success is unfairly judged in comparison with virtually every other country. Why? We are the only country that tests everybody. So when America's high school students' skills are compared to those around the world, we look worse because 100 percent of our students are being compared to only the best in the other countries. Something to think about.
Testing can identify problem kids. But the way tests are used now they're a fraud because their predictive value is LESS than that of simply using grades. Why use an expensive tool when a better tool/data set already exists? Instead wealthy parents get their offspring into college more easily because they can afford expensive prep classes. School time is wasted and not spent learning to use reason, to practice, to investigate. No wonder the US compares so extremely poorly to other nations.
Multiple choice questions are an insult to intelligence. Essay writing and solving problems with extended response should be used to judge students' progress. Who better than teachers can assess the students? It is time to move away from for profit companies to create tests and evaluate students. Teachers can be paid by the states to grade students' reading, writing and math.
Well, youpie, this is already happening. Please do some research on "subjective" and "objective" testing! Students are, indeed, being graded on "essay writing" and "solving problems with extended response." "For profit companies" do NOT create standardized K-12 tests! ALL of the items are created by the school systems. Period. "For profit" companies simply help to collect the data. They do NOT create the tests!
Illinois just made the decision to "rescore" the ISAT due to obvious flaws. Standardized tests are a political tool used to make parents believe the governement is acting for education. Why not use the money spent by the military for education?
And follow the friends of the CEO's company banking most of the money for testing. You will understand why the NCLB law was created...
The video argues that applying what one has learned is more important than filling in bubbles. If a student cannot correctly answer test questions about material they have learned, that directly contradicts the notion of applying learned material. I will be researching the information on your website for answers but what I have seen so far makes me question whether what the group advocates is grounded in logic.
Totally agree with the sentiment, but c'mon, would it have been so hard not to split an infinitive in the narration?? ("..to quickly fill in bubbles on a test answer sheet...") Anybody pitching education reform should get the grammar right! That said: Right on.
Actually the grammar prescription about "split infinitive" has been introduce arbitrarily by English scholars in the 18th century in order to emulate Latin grammar, where also some forms of this type are forbidden (they are not really forbidden, simply they don't appear in the texts from the Golden Age of Latin) .
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
And follow the friends of the CEO's company banking most of the money for testing. You will understand why the NCLB law was created...