Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Calvinism is Heresy : Limited Atonement Refuted

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
3,780
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 11, 2009

Refuting the Heresy of Limited Atonement advocated by Calvinists

  • likes, 34 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (525)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @RedSun875 Hi, how are you? :-)

  • This "Atonement" Doctrine is not a chatolic heresy?

    The atonement or the "penal substitution" ( as it is sometimes called) doctrine was never taught in the Early Church, it is a man-made doctrine that has developed gradually since 1098.

    This doctrine is the main reason, of which the Christian are leaving the church.

    What position is correct?

    The one that comes from tradition Atonement was not present in church tradition for 1000 years.

  • If God wills everyone to be saved (1 Tim. 2:3-6) then why are all not saved? Man's will doesn't override God's will. In addition, in 1 Tim 4:10, if God is the Saviour of all men, why are not all saved? You may say that they rejected salvation but nowhere is man's response, yes or no, mentioned in either verse. That interpretation is supplied only by the Arminian so he can boast in his decision making and isn't biblical. Both verses speak on Limited Atonement, not Unlimited Atonement.

  • yes Jesus died for all men out of every nation, but only those whom the Father gives to him get saved and that's election and limited atonement. very simple and the Gospel teaches it John 6:37-45 (only those given to the Son have saving faith) and God draws the distinction not man.

  • "Damned to hell without ever even doing anything?" I though "all have sinned!" I also thought that the "penalty for sin is death." However, I don't find in scripture where the bible says that God owes anyone atonement or a "chance" to believe. So are you saying that if God in fact chose to passover the non-elect and "have mercy on whom HE would have mercy" and allow the rest to receive what they deserve (justice) that God is unjust?

  • And now you have withdrew all your baseless comments but the one calling me a troll, so no one can see why I responded the way I did. You Weasel you. :D

  • @RedSun875 A better way to put it. Your so bold as to call calvinists heritics that play the satan card when I call your approach to that claim as clownish and call me a troll. You must love double standards. :P

  • @graceexplosion I'm simply pointing out your unbalenced appeal to feelings and counter attacking your slander.Even now you appeal to things not by text but on emotions. Carnal Christian, take your own medecine with cheer. :D

  • @graceexplosion LOL. I would like to know how you justify that claim. :P

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more