Girl With Schizophrenia Loses Touch With Reality Part 1

No description available.

• Category

  People & Blogs

[MrMetatron7777]

Oprah's gigantic ass

[TheCymbiont]

Voyeur actually literally means 'watcher', and doesn't have to relate to sexual acts. In this case, the camera crew is forcing their way into her world by asking all these intrusive questions. All for the sole purpose of entertaining the viewers.

In that way it's the same as a 'regular' voyeur entertainment.

[Nadia Wolff]

beautiful mind :)

[pricakes]

This makes me angry :| People should just leave her alone.

[HappyGuyxlii]

And they do. From personal accounts, these medications have been quite effective, although there's always the chance that they won't (accounts of people "not feeling like themselves" (giving rise to conspiracy theories surrounding pharmaceutical companies)). I'll give you room to breathe after this wall of text and perhaps respond.

[HappyGuyxlii]

You may have heard of the scientific method. Ask a question. Hypothesize. Observe. Record. Draw conclusions. Share.

Eventually, enough data on a subject will be compiled to give people a reasonable picture of how something works. For example, schizophrenia. There is enough data compiled on the subject to classify someone (or not classify someone) as schizophrenic.

Following this are medications which have been tested and proven to work for a majority of people.

[HappyGuyxlii]

(cont.) Therefore he is not infringing by arguing with you.

About psychiatry. Despite being literally "medical treatment of the soul", it is an earnest attempt to classify and record symptoms of existing mental conditions/defects/etc. in order to help prevent them. Because it deals with huge variables (everyone's brain is different), the knowledge dealing with psychology and psychiatry is obviously flawed. We can both recognize that. But it does happen to follow a very scientific process.

[HappyGuyxlii]

Now that my statement's out of the way, I can point out bias in your statements. First, Scientology. L. Ron Hubbard was actually a close friend of Robert Heinlein, a notable science fiction writer. Hubbard himself was a science fiction writer before Scientology became a recognized religion/cult/whatever you will name it. That statement from rissi was actually valid.

The First Amendment is about free speech, certainly. But it limits the forceful removal of statements already made.

[HappyGuyxlii]

I'm going to start in on this conversation because it's interesting to me.

First, you should acknowledge that anything that is contrary to your own opinions will most likely not move you in any way, similar to how your words will not move those opposing your opinions (I could explain more, but there is limited space here).

If you are going to have an argument, do it in good nature. Personal investments in an argument usually undermine the point you're trying to make and it will not get across.

[Yallitstheryannish]

Oh oprah

[Kate E]

WHAT!?!?!? ARE YOU BEING SERIOUS? THIS GIRL HAS A SERIOUS ILLNESS. HER PARENTS DONT JUST WANT 'ATTENTION'. ITS SERIOUS NOT SOME STUPID JOKE >.<

[ginablackhawk]

Wow. That's the best you can do? You use words as bullying bullets. They go poof, like smoke in the air. Your words are wasted efforts to make an impact or impression on anyone. Your evaluative and invalidative attempt at attacking me sounds INSANE, just like you are. That's worse than your ignorance about life, people, letting others think for themselves and the First Amendment right to Free Speech.