Moon Dehoax: Independent evidence of Apollo 15's landing site.

Moon missions were real: Multiple views of Hadley Rile, Apollo 15's landing site, by Kaguya, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency moon explorer.

This video has been created by Lunar Tuner:

http://www.youtube.com/user/LunarTuner

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• moon
• hoax
• apollo
• 16
• nasa
• thebadastronomer
• svector
• conspiracy
• 911
• ufo
• space
• sts
• cars
• buzz
• aldrin

[rich2rock]

I just think that for a lot of people, the only proof that is acceptable is seeing what they put up there. The Van Allen Radiation belt is a hard thing to just explain away without explicit proof of what we left there. It's not like having to prove that god exists. If there IS physical evidence left there, then that is what people need to see. What you have posted proves nothing to me or a lot of people. The motives for hoaxing it are very plausible. Sorry, but thanks anyway.

[jcgmed]

@rich2rock Regrettably, that is the most preferred argumentation for hoax theorists, this is, staying hardly above the undetectable for later assuming the impossibility of everything related against their accusations, while being careful about not getting too much into the details for avoiding the questions coming from anyone willing to believe Apollo missions were nothing but a forgery.

[jcgmed]

@rich2rock The previous is, in fact, the most remarkable aspect from the pseudoscientific basis of hoax beliefs, even sometimes using technology to debunk technology itself, like a dog trying to bite its tail.

Now, getting into the affair of the Van Allen radiation belt.

The deadly amount of radiation is 30 sv but the amount of radiation at Van Allen's is 25 sv per year, and this, if and only if the only shielding available is a 3mm wide aluminum foil.

[jcgmed]

@rich2rock This means 304 days orbiting, and only if passing through the inner belt all the time.

But not only aluminium foil can be a way for decreasing the amount of incoming radiations, now that magnetism can help a lot, just as Earth's magnetic field protects us from much of the incoming radiations from outerspace, and it was one more of radiation protection procedures implemented on both modules from Apollo missions, this helped a little on weight economy.

Cheers.

[LindaStevensBZ]

What does this clip prove?

Well...if you're a HoaxTard, it just means that ALL of the Japanese Space Science Community is in on the big Coverup too...after 37+ years.

LOL!

If you have a >100 IQ, it is just another fascinating aspect of the Moon and Apollo.

[IndividualParties]

@MrToiletface

Obviously you weren't paying attention. The image was generated by rotating 3D images of the moons surface. All they did was use the data collected from the orbiter to generate an image of the apollo landing site.

" its way too blurry. wheres the detail in the surface?"

It's called resolution. Face it, the laughably preposterous conspiracy delusions about the apollo missions are disproven.

[Blahblobify]

@virgo396

"what does this prove?"

listen from 1:20 on and try to pay attention

[Thinkcity]

Mythbusters did a good programe on the Moon hoax theories, and Busted them all.

[virgo396]

what exactly does this prove?

[IndividualParties]

Plus, toiletface, we now have images of the hardware as well as tracks from the rover, thanks to the 25cm by 25cm per pixel resolution of the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera:

"Probe pictures Moon landing sites" By Jonathan Amos

Science correspondent, BBC News

Uh! Oh! hoaxtards, time to start screaming "FAKE," save your cult of denial from utter defeat and humiliation.

[IndividualParties]

@MrToiletface

Either you're a troll, or you are really fucking stupid. The maps came from the Japanese orbiter Kaguya. The Japanese didn't send it up to see the hardware or to prove the Apollo landings, you fucking idiot. They had no goals that required a greater than 10 m/pixel resolution in the design limits of this particular camera; the orbiter just provided us with 3D-topological maps that fit with the Apollo photos of the terrain.

[MrToiletface]

lol yeah... they sent a probe up to look at the landing sites. unfortunetly they didnt build it well enough to see the apollo landing gear. they decided to spend a fortune sending up a camera that cant see mankinds greatest acheivement. youd have to be the biggest moron in the world to swallow this shit. individual parties, ur a fucking idiot and u dont know wtf ur talking about. swallow my hot shit you virgin loser faggit hahahahahaha go wipe ur ass with ol glorey u homo hahahaha

[theprops]

i think they did land on the moon but when they got there their camera's aren't working bcoz of the vacuum, and they say "millions of people are watching we need to fake the photos and videos".