Green Gone Wrong - Heather Rogers

Green Gone Wrong - Heather Rogers discusses the myth of green capitalism at Socialism 2009 conference in Chicago

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• heather
• rogers
• green
• gone
• wrong
• myth
• capitalism

[Beowulfsonur]

@LukeScientiae..My reply to you is on my Channel Comments at the top since youtube does not allow links to be posted here....

[LukeScientiae]

@Beowulfsonur No, I keep telling you: I am not paid to blog in any way. My blog doesn't even have adverts on it. What is it about you that makes you want to allege so many falsehoods?

[Beowulfsonur]

@LukeScientiae...Now, in this case, you have it in the water and people are drinking different amounts of water. So you have huge variations in the consumption of this drug. So, it's against all modern principles of pharmacology. It's obsolete, I don't think anybody in Sweden, not a single dentist, would bring up this question in Sweden anymore." -Dr. Arvid Carlsson, a famed pharmacologist at Gothenburg University and recent winner of the Nobel Prize in Medicine/Physiology.

[Beowulfsonur]

@LukeScientiae...CONNETT: What about this notion of using the water supply as a vehicle of delivering medication? Can you speak to what you see as the problems with that?

CARLSSON: Yea, it's absolutely obsolete. In modern pharmacology it's so clear that even if you have a fixed dose of a drug, the individuals respond very differently to one and the same dose...

[Beowulfsonur]

@LukeScientiae..."I'm not paid in the way you continue to allege."-LukeScientiae ..But you are being paid..Adverts (advertisements) as you call them do pay you though.

[Beowulfsonur]

@LukeScientiae...Sodium fluorosilicate: S6 (Poison)

This material is hazardous according to criteria of ASCC; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE.

Subclasses:

6.1 Category C: Substances which are acutely toxic.

6.4 Category A: Substances that are irritating to the eye.

9.3 Category B: Substances that are ecotoxic to terrestrial vertebrates.

[LukeScientiae]

@Beowulfsonur I've already told you that how poisonous something is is down to the concentration and its relation to other chemicals. You cannot just say something is a poison outside of data about concentrations. That is why LD50 values are measured, for example. Fluoridation of water has a beneficial health effect at low concentrations for the reason that it acts against tooth decay, which can get very nasty. You're not going to make that fact go away by cherry-picking.

[LukeScientiae]

@Beowulfsonur You're an idiot. All you're doing is repeating things you don't understand and you're simply ignoring chemical reality to do it. And, what's worse, YOU KNOW that you're chemically illiterate and are happy to make it abundantly clear. Fluorine and fluoride is NOT the same thing (you don't recognize the difference), you ignore the THOUSANDS of independent studies I directed you to on fluoridation of water, you lie about Hitler using it. Why bother?

[Beowulfsonur]

@LukeScientiae...6.8 Category B: Substances that are suspected human reproductive or developmental toxicants.

6.9 Category A: Substances that are toxic to human target organs or systems.

9.1 Category D: Substances that are slightly harmful to the aquatic environment or are otherwise designed for biocidal action.

9.3 Category B: Substances that are ecotoxic to terrestrial vertebrates...

[Beowulfsonur]

@LukeScientiae.. Sodium fluoride: S6 (Poison)

This material is hazardous according to criteria of Safe Work Australia; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE.Subclasses:

6.1 Category C: Substances which are acutely toxic.

6.3 Category A: Substances that are irritating to the skin.

6.4 Category A: Substances that are irritating to the eye.

6.6B Category III: Substances which cause concern for humans owing to possible mutagenic effects.

...