Ian and friends,
I hope you will enjoy this discussion of infinity. Please feel free to leave your thoughts. Part II is at:
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Ian and friends,
I hope you will enjoy this discussion of infinity. Please feel free to leave your thoughts. Part II is at:
Like to rate videos and let people know what you think?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Like to share videos with friends?
Automatically share your ratings, favorites, and more on Facebook, Twitter, and Google Reader with YouTube Autoshare.
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
After reading Logicomix I had been wondering what the continuum hypothesis was. Very good explanation! Can you do the same for Godel's Incompleteness Theorem?
Well, in my opinion that is a bold guess. I'm used to thinking of math as something that physics and the sciences use (typically for quantifying and simplifying reality). These mathematical truths might be a useful way to model the framework of the universe, but I'm not sure if it can support it. Having said that ...
Fractals show up in nature just as often as they show up in mathematics. So it could be that there is some third party supporting both.
Hi, very nice vid, would like to have seen proof for the last bit with the square, but I think I've worked it out. Consider [0,1] -> [0,1]^2 Write x in [0,1] in binary, eg 0.75 = 0.101111... Suppose x = 0.abcdefgh... Then let X=0.aceg... Y=0.bdfh... Then we can map x to (X,Y) It must clearly be injective, two different x's can't give the same (X,Y) Given any (X,Y) there is clearly an x which maps to it, so it is surjective. So the mapping is bijective. Hence (0,1) can be paired off with (0,1)^2.
With the diagonalization, it helped me realize that the new number itself cannot be on the list because if it was, then one of its numbers would be adjusted and hence it would no longer be on the list.
Thx: So, in this video, I was speaking of the cardinality of sets (not functions). For example, the real interval (-1, 3) is the same size as all of R (i.e. those two sets have the same cardinality). A function is what is used to compare the cardinality of two sets (i.e. if there is a 1-1 correspondence function between two sets, then they have equal cardinality/size). In your example, you mention the set R, and two functions, so I'm not quite clear on the question. Elaborate
Autoshare makes certain YouTube activities public on the services you choose. Select only the services you are comfortable with - like Facebook, Twitter, or Google Reader - to let your friends know what you like on YouTube. You can turn Autoshare off at any time.
Fractals show up in nature just as often as they show up in mathematics. So it could be that there is some third party supporting both.
Thanks for the feedback.
Consider [0,1] -> [0,1]^2
Write x in [0,1] in binary, eg 0.75 = 0.101111...
Suppose x = 0.abcdefgh...
Then let X=0.aceg... Y=0.bdfh...
Then we can map x to (X,Y)
It must clearly be injective, two different x's can't give the same (X,Y)
Given any (X,Y) there is clearly an x which maps to it, so it is surjective.
So the mapping is bijective.
Hence (0,1) can be paired off with (0,1)^2.