@southparkfan2717 You are being silly. Perhaps consider other points of view before stampeding on like a narrow-minded bigot. There was need of reform, of course, but the huge exaggerations in this film, along with it's complete white-washing of Martin Luther makes it simply propoganda. Check the critic reviews for example. The selling of indulgences was recent when Martin Luther turned up. As I said before, there is no evidence to paint the whole Catholic Church as 'corrupt'.
@assasincomedy There is plenty of evidence. Catholics talk of Martin Luther as if he were the soul cause of the Reformation. There had been plenty of people questioning the BS of the Catholic Church, such as the selling of indulgences long before Luther came around. Luther was just the one who had the guts to stand up and say "no more", he had followers for a reason. Because people had enough of the lies of the pope.
@southparkfan2717 Yes I do deny it. There is no evidence to suggest the majority of the Catholic Church was corrupt, absolutely none. Just stereotypes. There were 'some' individuals that were corrupt in various places, as with all institutions. Johann Tetzel and Albert of Mainz come to mind. But to say that the 'Church' was corrupt is a historical and theological error and simply bowing down to political correctness.
@jesusisonlyway Oh the Papacy has always been extremely corrupt. I am no Catholic, if that's what you believe.
You say "12 tribes of Israel>Our Savior JESUS>12 Jewish Apostles"
If this is certainly the case, why would God allow one of his greatest men, Martin Luther, to be the man who guided a nation into the mass slaughter of the people he considers greater than Jesus? Certainly he would not want people associating such a massacre with God or Jesus, right?
@mavriksfan11 while researching you should research these popes Liberius Honorius I Stephen VI John XII Benedict IX, Boniface VIII Benedict VI Urban VI Pope John Paul I Sixtus IV Innocent VIII This is just a FEW! Protestants have proven JESUS is the SOLID ROCK of HIS church not a "man. According to the Jewish Jesus, Salvation of the Jews John4:22=12 Tribes of Israel> Our Savior JESUS>12 Jewish Apostles, NOT gentiles & no office of priest in NT anywhere. Jesus = ONLY intercessor
@jesusisonlyway I'm interested in human psychology. Part of my assignments were to see what compels people to believe nonsense like what Martin Luther wrote in his book "On the Jews and Their Lies"
My thesis for the paper I'm going to write is that the contributing factor to people's beliefs is not whether the idea makes sense or not, but rather whether the person who spouts them is noble. Martin Luther was revered by many (including you) which makes his book more receptive to a large audience
@southparkfan2717 G-ds Jewish you lot need to get used to the fact
burnley5960 1 month ago
@southparkfan2717 Please study history before making yourself look like a fool.
assasincomedy 3 months ago
@southparkfan2717 You are being silly. Perhaps consider other points of view before stampeding on like a narrow-minded bigot. There was need of reform, of course, but the huge exaggerations in this film, along with it's complete white-washing of Martin Luther makes it simply propoganda. Check the critic reviews for example. The selling of indulgences was recent when Martin Luther turned up. As I said before, there is no evidence to paint the whole Catholic Church as 'corrupt'.
assasincomedy 3 months ago
@assasincomedy There is plenty of evidence. Catholics talk of Martin Luther as if he were the soul cause of the Reformation. There had been plenty of people questioning the BS of the Catholic Church, such as the selling of indulgences long before Luther came around. Luther was just the one who had the guts to stand up and say "no more", he had followers for a reason. Because people had enough of the lies of the pope.
Now why don't you go buy your way into heaven.
southparkfan2717 3 months ago
@southparkfan2717 Yes I do deny it. There is no evidence to suggest the majority of the Catholic Church was corrupt, absolutely none. Just stereotypes. There were 'some' individuals that were corrupt in various places, as with all institutions. Johann Tetzel and Albert of Mainz come to mind. But to say that the 'Church' was corrupt is a historical and theological error and simply bowing down to political correctness.
assasincomedy 3 months ago
@assasincomedy The Catholic Church was corrupt. Do you deny this?
southparkfan2717 3 months ago
This is the biggest piece of garbage jingoistic movie I have ever seen. Nothing more than propoganda.
assasincomedy 4 months ago
@jesusisonlyway Oh the Papacy has always been extremely corrupt. I am no Catholic, if that's what you believe.
You say "12 tribes of Israel>Our Savior JESUS>12 Jewish Apostles"
If this is certainly the case, why would God allow one of his greatest men, Martin Luther, to be the man who guided a nation into the mass slaughter of the people he considers greater than Jesus? Certainly he would not want people associating such a massacre with God or Jesus, right?
mavriksfan11 6 months ago
jesusisonlyway 6 months ago
@jesusisonlyway I'm interested in human psychology. Part of my assignments were to see what compels people to believe nonsense like what Martin Luther wrote in his book "On the Jews and Their Lies"
My thesis for the paper I'm going to write is that the contributing factor to people's beliefs is not whether the idea makes sense or not, but rather whether the person who spouts them is noble. Martin Luther was revered by many (including you) which makes his book more receptive to a large audience
mavriksfan11 6 months ago