Extortion Drama

The Websters received an extortion call claiming Joan was alive on 10-14-1982 following the announcement of a higher reward. A plan was in place to meet with the extortion caller in Concord NH. FBI SA Frank Barletto posed as George's cousin and the three travelled by car under FBI surveillance. US Attorneys did not press charges for false information, crossing state lines, or demanding reward money. Joan's brother Steve claims no knowledge of the incident. Recognizing I have been told things did not happen that did, or vice versa, is a pattern I have experienced. My daughter also recorded the same mental manipulation by her father. Cold War brainwashing tactics were part of the CIA training during the CIA years of George and Eleanor Webster. It disorients one from the truth and trusting their instincts. The documents my children wrote, in my possession, are are a likely motive to discredit. It apparently applies to Joan's case as well as I discover a far different story than what I had believed for many years.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• cia
• fbi
• extortion
• protected
• informant
• joan
• webster
• unsolved
• murder
• cover
• up
• brainwashing
• control
• abuse
• steve
• corruption
• essex
• county
• massachusetts
• boston
• logan
• airport
• missing

[eveknowsthetruth]

Are you suggesting court records and sworn affidavits aren't reliable? People haven't read the files on these cases so I am not too concerned. Greater knowledge changes perceptions. I don't need your suggestions what is a worthwhile use of my time. The whole thing is being reviewed where need be. The Websters know how to reach me and can speak for themselves. They know there are serious discrepencies. It's a reflection of them they don't seem to care.

[eveknowsthetruth]

It seems a good place to point out there were 2 witnesses in the Iannuzzi trial threatened with never seeing their children again. Both of their testimony changed from the grand jury to the trial. Is it coincidence I have been blocked from my children and have knowledge this case was a sham? The Websters know I have very damaging documents to the family image. There are a lot of victims falling out of the Webster family.

[eveknowsthetruth]

There are documents being shown so there's a great deal of substance whether you chose to recognize that or not. I know the individual based on multiple cases and what was submitted to the courts, media, and other authorities. By your profile I see you were 1 year old at the time Joan disappeared. I have no idea what you know or base it on. There are several people who would like this covered up. They wouldn't be a reliable source. My concerns are based on actual records and personal. knowledge.

[eveknowsthetruth]

Signed names on sworn statements that are false in a capital crime are very good justifications. There is no substance to your personal attacks of me. Blowing the whistle makes people the target of such devaluation. It does nothing to change the record of multiple cases. Since you have no knowledge of events surrounding abuse allegations, I don't think you can comment about who acted in the interest of victims.

[eveknowsthetruth]

Defamation is defined as: false or unjustified injury of the good reputation of another. There is a great deal of justification for the concerns. What makes you think I knew things while he was alive? I am used to the attacks you are levying. You don't know me, my experience, or the Websters. What I see are efforts to discredit. That only blocks the truth of things for so long.

[eveknowsthetruth]

This individual was a public servant delegated the responsibility of truth, justice, and public safety. I didn't put his name on documents that made representations to the court and others. Are you suggesting a badge immunizes someone from being challenged when it's learned his statements were false?