Naudet, lobby WTC

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
9,893
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 11, 2008

Like the plane hit the lobby

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @2000newyorkcity Scientist have found high grade nano-thermite in the WTC dust on 9/11. This kind of material is not something a terrorist can create in a cave in Afghanistan, it made in high-tech military defense contract laboratories. This material was everywhere in all the dust collected. It is smaller than a human hair & can be only seen under high power microscopes yet it was in every dust sample collected from 911. Do your research before going off on an idiotic rant.

  • @2000newyorkcity And tower 3 didn't collapse, it like tower 4, 5, & 6 were heavily damaged and parts of it were completely destroyed bu the main supporting structure held up. Tower 7 was a football-field away from the twin towers and 47 stories high with minor office fires yet it collapsed perfectly into itself with no resistance at 5:20 in the afternoon.

  • @2000newyorkcity If you're going to insult me & say I should have died that day because I am showing the evidence of how they were demolished, then you should be telling the same thing to the majority of 911 victim's family members who don't believe anything about he official story & are fighting to get the truth.

  • @2000newyorkcity When the towers "collapsed" the top section would not have forced the rest of the tower to fall into itself like it did but rather the resistance would have slowed down the speed. Instead we see an acceleration at free fall which is impossible under the laws of physics, there is absolutely no resistance what so ever, that should alarm you. Tower 7 obviously was a demo'd because the four supporting beams on each side of the building wouldn't go at the same time.

  • @2000newyorkcity Instead of insulting me & relying on emotional arguments rather then scientific debates then maybe we can have a real debate. Their are hundreds upon hundreds of architects, demolition experts, metallurgist, physicist, scientist, ect, who have dis-proven the government's "Conspiracy theory" of the twin towers pancake scenario of 1 floor collapsing the other.

  • @9999necron you really are a total asshole. Ummmmm Tower 1 and Tower 2 as well as Towers 3 and other buildings all collapsed and WTC Tower 7 was close by. Why do buildings fall when there is an earthquake? You really are a moron. The amount of force which all of those Towers collapsed was like a huge earthquake and it destroyed the internal stuctures of Tower 7. Maybe you should have been in the Twin Towers when they collapsed you sob bastard. This is their way to blame Bush.

  • @TheTriangleTower W/e it'd be a waste of time to explain how it was an obvious controlled demolition when you're not even open to the idea. 2 words for you... Building 7. Wasn't hit by a plane & came down into its own footprint at 5:20 PM.

  • @9999necron Just was a Terrorist Attack of Osama Bin Laden. They didn't put a bomb in the lobby or in the subway.

    All the people could see the planes crashing into the towers.

  • @TheTriangleTower Jet fuel wouldn't travel down 80-100 floors from the initial crash site. The first responders said it had to have been a bomb the way it happened. You honestly think fire could travel that far down an elevator shaft or staircase?

  • @9999necron No, It wasn't. Thats was the explotion of Jet Fuel in the side West of the Lobby

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more