Test A&H Xone:22 & Pioneer CDJ-400 DJ Conrad eS [jaw/pl]
Loading...
7,225
Loading...
Uploader Comments (leosharepl)
see all
All Comments (8)
-
i will buy xone 22... is powerful, minimal but powerful..XD and stylish
Loading...
Używasz pendrivów w tych CDJ'ach? Słyszałem że nie najlepiej działają i należy grać tylko z płyt. Faktycznie tak jest?
Solar6DJ 1 year ago
Nie prawda:) wbrew pozorom, super sprawa... tzn lepsze były by karty SD, ale peny tez zajebiste rozwiązanie. Ja jestem osobiście zadowolony.
leosharepl 1 year ago
So ? How is it ?
Does it worth it ? Or the djm400 is better ?
mitzichi 2 years ago
@mitzichi, hi... DJM 400 this's great, topping equipment, It is similar in use for other this type of product. I am satisfied. Really, I advice.
leosharepl 2 years ago
I was actually interested in Xone 22. But Only now i've seen that this is a test for both Xone and djm400.
The thing is that I am thinking about buying a Xone , but recently found out that Dj's around here have had a lot of problems with Xone. So they recommend Pioneer mixers. Now, I'm really confused about taking a decision.
In your opinion , what would you by if Xone 22 and DJM400 would be at exactly the same price ? Xone 22 or DJM400 ?
Thanks a lot in advance.
mitzichi 2 years ago
so ;) DJM 400 it's ok, but better quality of sound has Xone. It owns analog converters and it is a lot cheapest. If you would like to buy choose xone 22 or 42 :) really. It does does not create pioneer bad equipment. These equipment it good choice, you must decide. Xone tt is simple in attendance... your choice ;]
leosharepl 2 years ago