Top Comments
All Comments (79)
-
@sweetbilly So there ha ha. Now I have given you the truth ha ha. So you can't refute it. No science ha ha
-
@javierenchina You are very correct. Scale is the key. Viscosity, temperature, gravitaional and magnetic forces, dynamics of the magma's volume, etc. If you'd take a snapshot, you can see a plume and a standing corridor (at 0:24). But the claim is, that our actual models are not accurate. And I agree on that.
-
(And by "these sort of rumours" I mean the stories about natural history, but also religion in general.)
-
"The modern theory "magma plumes" contradicts all we know about physics. "
That simply isn't true. If you knew about physics or the current theories (the refinement in the video included), you would immediately realise that's incorrect.
But instead you prefer to get your beliefs about a subject from other scientifically illiterate and prejudiced people.
Because you're a tool. You're used like a hammer and nails by the groups who originate these sort of rumours.
-
You don't understand the science or evidence involved but you're sure the history of earth must be something that conforms to your religious prejudices.
Why can't you just admit that your beliefs are based on faith, and stop trying to disguise your religious beliefs as science.
They're not, and it's pointless for you to even discuss science if your beliefs cannot be changed by evidence.
-
"the intensity of earthquakes have been getting statistically greater and greater over the past few of years."
Interesting if true. Source?
"evolutionary centric science can't explain that"
Obviously not. Evolution refers to biology.
"Unless they claim nuclear reactions are happening in the earth like in the sun. ha ha "
Not like the sun, fission not fusion.
"This vid is proof of that"
No the vid is a claim/hypothesis of that. Only observations of the physical world are evidence.
-
You seem to think saying things using sciencey sounding words makes them science. It doesn't.
-
It's not logical, this isn't what's happening. That''s what they are saying in the video, the model for magma plumes has failed. Rising rock cools as it rises, not heats. The modern theory "magma plumes" contradicts all we know about physics.
-
"religion"
No, you're completely wrong. You have no idea about the method.
-
Cooling rock would lock the tectonic plates in, not increase the occurrence of greater and greater magnitude earthquakes. Plate tectonics is an asinine theory that is antiquated and needs to be disposed of.
Lava lamps have already proven half of what they're talking about.
LemonsNeedHelp 3 years ago 8
hmm...with MAGMA fluid dynamics, I'd imagine there's so much nonlinear action going on I'm not confident this can be an accurate model of it since it's scaled down so much
javierenchina 3 years ago 6